COMM.OF INCOME TAX BANGALORE vs. NAVABHARAT ENTERPRISES HYD
In the result, Income Tax Appeal No
ITTA/3/2000HC Telangana02 Jan 2012
Bench: This Court & Hence Both Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Decided By This Common Judgment. 2. Sri Ravi Kant, Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Rahul Agarwal, Advocate Have Appeared On Behalf Of Assessee & Sri Manish Goel, Advocate Has Put In Appearance On Behalf Of Revenue. 3. Revenue'S Appeal Was Admitted On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law:- (1)Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, Tribunal Was Right In Holding That Authorization For Search
For Appellant: - M/S Verma Roadways Through its Partner R.K.VermaFor Respondent: - Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Section 132Section 158Section 260A
4) takes care of such person in telling
true facts to the searching officer explaining on whose behalf he held
custody of valuables. Court also noticed that purpose and object of
Section 132 of Act, 1961 can be achieved when a timely action is taken
without giving any opportunity to the person concerned to distroy
material, remove it or manufacture
