BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai69Karnataka51Delhi27Chennai16Telangana15Bangalore13Kolkata9Jaipur5Ahmedabad3Hyderabad3Pune3SC3Surat3Visakhapatnam2Rajkot1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 260A14Section 143(3)14Disallowance14Addition to Income14Section 112

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. Ascend Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited

ITTA/346/2015HC Telangana06 Apr 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 11Section 260Section 32

43C, That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee and used for the business purposes. It further provides for deduction subject to section 34. In that matter also, a similar argument, as in the present case, was advanced on behalf of the revenue, namely, that depreciation

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s Y.Ramakrishna and Others

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/169/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry. vs. m/s Ganesh Arrack Contractors,

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/305/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s GRK Prasad AND others

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/302/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. m/S.M.Ventakteswara Rao AND Others

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/126/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

The Commissioner of income tax, vs. M/s.Y.Ramulu and Others

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/197/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

COMMR.OF I.T. RKAJAHMUNDRY vs. T.RAMI REDDY AND ORS

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/77/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ms. B.krishna Murthy AND Others

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/294/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

COMMISSIONER OFINCOEMETAX vs. M/S. V.SATYANARAYANA AND OTHERS

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/170/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

The Commissioner of Income tax vs. M/s.V.Satyanrayana AND Others

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/227/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. M/S G.R.K.PRASAD AND OTHERS

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/333/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

COMMISSISONER OF I.T. RAJAHMUNDRY vs. M/S.Y RAMAKRISHNA AND OTHERS

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/141/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s.G.V.Krishna Reddy AND Others

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/151/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s.B.Satyanarayana AND Others

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/240/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated

The commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s.M.Narayana Choudary and Others

In the result, for the above reasons, we set aside the orders

ITTA/208/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Sections 28 to 43C of the Act, which contain the procedure for computation of income from business. Impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal In all the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the case of Anakapalle Arrack Shops. In some of the cases, the Tribunal followed the order dated