BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 35Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai256Delhi208Chennai85Bangalore42Kolkata42Ahmedabad37Hyderabad29Raipur19Karnataka8Cochin7Rajkot5Jaipur5Pune3SC3Telangana3Guwahati3Visakhapatnam2Cuttack2Punjab & Haryana2Kerala1Dehradun1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Lucknow1Nagpur1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 35D9Section 43(1)2Section 37(1)2Section 372Section 2602Deduction2

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Independent Assemblies of God

ITTA/290/2005HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 260Section 35D

disallowed. 2. The matter relates to Assessment Year 1997-98. The appellant is engaged in the business of automobile parts. With intent to expand its business outside the country, it incurred travelling and staff expenses outside the country during 1995-96 and 1996-97. The appellant attempted to set up a unit in China. The project could not be materialized

M/S AVANTHI BUSINESS MACHINES LTD., HYDERABAD. vs. DCIT [ASSTS] CIRCLE -1 [1] HYDERABAD.

Appeal is disposed of

ITTA/375/2006HC Telangana07 Jun 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

SRl. A.V. A SIVA KARTIKEYA FOR
For Appellant:
For Respondent: SRI J V PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 1aSection 260Section 260ASection 35DSection 37Section 43B

Section 35D of the Act from the assessment year 1997' 1998 onwards. It was however noticed by the assessing officer that the assessee had not employed the public issue money either in extension of business or in setting up of a new unit till the assessment year 2OOL-2OO2. ln that view of the matter, claim of the assessee

The Commissioner of Income Tax -II vs. M/S Heritage Foods India Limited,

ITTA/408/2006HC Telangana02 Feb 2012
Section 35DSection 37Section 37(1)Section 43(1)

section 35D of the Act and the balance amount of Rs.70,99,425/- was disallowed by the Assessing Officer. 6. Feeling