BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 293clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi615Mumbai594Bangalore306Chennai200Kolkata175Jaipur114Ahmedabad80Raipur48Indore47Hyderabad46Amritsar42Lucknow40Pune35Chandigarh27Surat24Visakhapatnam23Nagpur21Jodhpur13Rajkot13Cochin12Patna10Panaji9Karnataka7Ranchi7Agra5Telangana4Allahabad3Dehradun3Cuttack2SC2Kerala1Jabalpur1Guwahati1Rajasthan1Calcutta1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 2609Section 2932

Commissioner of Income Tax -II vs. M/S Sri Ramanjaneya Poultry Farm Pvt., Ltd.,

ITTA/713/2006HC Telangana03 Dec 2013

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 293

disallows the claim, then plaintiff had appropriate remedy to challenge the said order in an appeal but the plaintiff failed to do so. This suit in view of Section 293

Commissioner of Income tax-V, vs. M/s. INTRACK INC,

ITTA/590/2013HC Telangana06 Dec 2013
Section 260

disallowance of expenditure. The tax, if is deducted at any time during the financial year and paid before the date of filing of the return, the Legislature intended to allow deduction on such expenditure with an intention to permit additional time for most deductors upto September of the next financial year. 17.1: We draw further support from the fact that

Kuchipudi Krishna Kishore vs. The DCIT

Accordingly the appeals deserves to be allowed by setting aside the impugned

ITTA/291/2007HC Telangana03 May 2024

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,N.TUKARAMJI

For Appellant: SRI A.V.A. SIVA KARTIKEYA on behalf ofFor Respondent: SRI ARVIND rep Ms. SUNDARI R PISUPATI
Section 260

293 OF 2007. COMMON JUDGMENT (per Hon'ble Sri Justice N. Tukaramji) These appeals are filed under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 (for short,'the Act') by the Assessee assailing the common order dated 22 12.2006 of lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench 'B', Hyderabad in l.T.A.Nos.g29: g28 and 827;lHyderabad/2005 for the Assessment years

The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. M/s Vaishnavi Educational Society

In the result, this Cross Objection is allowed and the suit is

ITTA/554/2015HC Telangana01 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

293) and Ayisha v. Abdul Nassar (2015 (4) KLT SN 22). Sri.Rafi, as DW2, deposed that he was working as a Medical Representative with an annual income of Rs.1,55,569/-. He also produced Exhibit B29 Income Tax Statement and Exhibit B30 Bank Statement to prove his source. In Exhibit B30, there is an entry relating to withdrawal of Rs.2