BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 270clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai879Delhi637Chennai248Bangalore216Kolkata196Jaipur104Pune95Ahmedabad88Hyderabad74Chandigarh68Surat48Cuttack36Calcutta35Indore29Rajkot29Allahabad23Amritsar23Karnataka20Guwahati16Panaji16Cochin13Visakhapatnam11Nagpur11Kerala7Agra5Raipur5Dehradun5Telangana5Lucknow5Varanasi4SC3Jodhpur3Patna2Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana2Ranchi1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 1534Deduction4Section 260A2Section 372Reassessment2

M/s Kausalya Agro Farms and Developers pvt. ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are allowed

ITTA/256/2022HC Telangana02 Feb 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 147Section 153Section 260ASection 37

270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 279, 281, 283, 284 and 294 of 2022 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) This order will dispose of the above batch of income tax appeals. 2. Heard Mr. Dwarakanath, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttam Reddy, learned counsel for the assessees/appellants and Ms. K.Mamata Choudary, learned

M/s. Dakshin Infrastructures Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are allowed

ITTA/275/2022
HC Telangana
02 Feb 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 147Section 153Section 260ASection 37

270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 279, 281, 283, 284 and 294 of 2022 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) This order will dispose of the above batch of income tax appeals. 2. Heard Mr. Dwarakanath, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttam Reddy, learned counsel for the assessees/appellants and Ms. K.Mamata Choudary, learned

The Commissioner of income Tax-II vs. M/s.Ideal Industrial Explosives Ltd

ITTA/100/2010HC Telangana01 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

For Appellant: M/S. CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD., THRISSURFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR

Section 115JA(2), which speaks of the provisions made for meeting liabilities, other than ascertained liabilities. The Honourable Supreme Court in (2008) 305 ITR 409 [Commissioner of Income Tax-IV v. HCL Comnet Systems and Services Ltd.] categorically held that the addition made under clause(c); of the provision for bad and doubtful debts cannot be permitted. However, clause

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s Polisetty Somasundaram,

ITTA/140/2013HC Telangana28 Jun 2013
Section 144Section 80

Section 143 (2) of the Act as well as the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. On the other hand, the AJAY PRASHER 2023.04.10 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA No.140 of 2013 (O&M) -4- appeal filed by the revenue-department was dismissed. Hence, the present appeal. Vide order dated 25.03.2014 passed

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. M/s.Mahaveer Enterprises [I] Ltd

ITTA/165/2008HC Telangana02 Feb 2012
Section 143(3)Section 158B

270 ITR 368 and on second issue counsel for the appellant has taken us to the order of the CIT(A) more particularly para 13 and para 16 of the order of the Tribunal which reads as under: “13. The next ground of the appellant relates to not allowing the deduction of net assets