Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 192clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,100 Delhi1,020 Bangalore571 Kolkata361 Chennai248 Indore172 Hyderabad129 Jaipur129 Ahmedabad81 Chandigarh76 Nagpur74 Agra66 Lucknow63 Raipur62 Amritsar55 Pune43 Cuttack37 Calcutta34 Surat33 Visakhapatnam32 Rajkot30 Cochin27 Guwahati25 Ranchi18 SC14 Jodhpur13 Varanasi12 Dehradun10 Karnataka8 Patna8 Allahabad6 Kerala5 Telangana5 Panaji4 Orissa2 Rajasthan2 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Uttarakhand1 Jabalpur1 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1 Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3 Deduction3 Section 260A2 Section 43D2 Section 272 Section 252 Section 80H2 Section 2152 Section 2632 Addition to Income

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sri B. Nagendar,

In the result, Tax Appeal is dismissed with a

ITTA/29/2001HC Telangana07 Nov 2013

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 143(3)Section 215Section 80HSection 80I

disallowance of discount of Rs.29,02,192/ and transport income of Rs.6,22,409/ made by AO for the purpose of calculation of deduction under Sections

STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD vs. DY COMMR. OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3 (2)

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/192/2006HC Telangana08 Feb 2023

N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

2

Bench:

Section 142Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 43D

192 of 2006 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) Heard Mr. Kartik Ramana Puttamreddy, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department for the respondent. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee as the appellant under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (briefly ‘the Act’ hereinafter

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. K. V. Srinivasa Rao

ITTA/480/2017HC Telangana01 Aug 2017

For Respondent: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Deputy

Section 120BSection 25Section 27Section 302

192, 623 of 2017 & Cr. Revision No. 114 of 2018 For the Appellant/State : Mr. Fariad Singh Virk and Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate General. : Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate for private respondents in Cr. Appeals No.192 and 623 of 2017. Cr. Appeal No. 337 of 2017 For the Appellant/State : Mr. Ajay Kochhar

Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) vs. Dr. K. Kalpana Reddy

ITTA/419/2012HC Telangana24 Aug 2018

Bench: M.GANGA RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 260Section 260ASection 263

disallow the claim of deduction? 2. Facts giving rise to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that the assessee is a banking company. The assessee filed return of income for Assessment Year 2007-08 on 29.10.2007 declaring total income of Rs.593,48,70,178/-. The return was processed under Section

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M.Venkata Krishna Mohan

ITTA/325/2005HC Telangana07 Apr 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 143(3) of the Act and the income of the appellant was determined at Rs.84,95,035/-. The assessing Officer (hereinafter „AO‟) came to the conclusion that since the payment of Rs.1 Crore was absent in the earlier license agreement and it was for use of the brand, the expenditure of Rs.1 Crore cannot be related to the business