Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Sri. B. Yadagiri,

Bench: The Appellate Commissioner. On All The Three Aspects, Referred To Above, The Appellate Authority Held In Favour Of The Respondent. In The Further Appeal Filed By The Department Before The Tribunal, The View Taken By The Appellate Authority Was Confirmed.

Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act. After hearing both the parties, the Tribunal framed the following three questions and referred them to this Court: 1. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in holding that allowance of expenditure has to be limited under Rule 6D with reference to the whole

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s Pitti Laminations Ltd.,

In the result, M.A.C.A.No

Bench: GODA RAGHURAM,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming compensation on account of the injuries that he sustained in an accident on 11.03.2001. He contended that, while he was travelling as a passenger in an auto rickshaw bearing registration No.KL-8/2064 through the Ayyanthole Civil Line Quarters Road, when the auto rickshaw reached the road junction, a car bearing