BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 155clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai426Delhi395Bangalore141Chennai103Ahmedabad68Chandigarh52Kolkata50Jaipur43Hyderabad38Raipur38Surat26Lucknow20Rajkot15Pune13SC11Cochin10Visakhapatnam8Indore8Jodhpur6Karnataka6Telangana4Guwahati3Panaji3Varanasi2Cuttack1Calcutta1Nagpur1Amritsar1Agra1Punjab & Haryana1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 32A5Section 80I4Section 13(1)(e)3Section 13(2)2Section 1152Addition to Income2

M/s.V.R.Farms Pvt Ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/272/2008HC Telangana28 Nov 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

depreciation. The rate of minimum tax was kept at a modest figure deeming 30 per cent of book profits as total income. This modest amount is likely to go down further with the downward revision of corporate tax rate to 35 per cent and abolition of surcharge. xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 45.4 The Act also inserts a new section 115JAA

COMMR OF INCOME TAX HYD vs. M/S.TAHER ENGG CORP. SECBAD

ITTA/85/2002HC Telangana03 Feb 2012

Bench: The Commissioner (Appeals). Through Order, Dated 04.12.1991, The Commissioner Allowed The Appeal & It Was Held That The Applicant Is Entitled To Treat The Unabsorbed Depreciation As Loss. Thereupon, The Department Carried The Matter In Appeal By Filing Ita.No.728/Hyd/1992 Before The Tribunal. The Tribunal Allowed The Appeal Through Its Order, Dated 28.08.1995 & Took The View That The Unabsorbed Depreciation Cannot Be Treated As Loss For The Purpose Of Section 115-J Of The Act.

Section 115
Section 143(1)
Section 155
Section 256(1)

Section 155-J of the Act and claimed certain benefits thereunder. The Assessing Officer took the view that the applicant is not entitled to treat the unabsorbed depreciation

COMM.OF INCOMETAX AP I HYD vs. M/S.DIAMOND HATCHERIES P.LTD HYD

ITTA/49/2001HC Telangana30 Jul 2013
Section 260ASection 32ASection 80B(5)Section 80I

depreciation, investment allowance etc. The Hon'ble High Court followed its decision reported in 218 ITR 71. The said decision was also followed in the case reported in 225 ITR 374. We may further refer to the decision of the Hon'be Supreme Court in the case of Moti Lal Pesticides (India) Pvt. Limited vs. CIT, 243 ITR 26 wherein

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. M/s Padmapriya Real Estates AND Financiers

In the result, the appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment passed by

ITTA/478/2006HC Telangana10 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 13(1)(e)Section 13(2)Section 313

Section 313 of Cr.P.C. has also been recorded in which he denied the circumstances appears against him, plead innocence and have submitted that he was posted as Junior Engineer from April 1978 to 1979 at PNT Department, Nasik. He was working since February 1980 in Irrigation Department. But the income of the said period was not counted. His wife