Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 84clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(2)2

Commissioner of Income TAx vs. Ongole Milk Line Pvt Ltd

Appeal is disposed of

ITTA/189/2014HC Telangana04 Apr 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

For Appellant: Mr. Pratyush Kumar

Section 166Section 5

delay in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned. I. A. No. 2832 of 2014 stands allowed. Misc. Appeal No. 189 of 2014 With the consent of both the parties, the matter is taken up to be decided on merit. The present appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company. It appears that claimants had filed claim petition being

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. Prasad Film Laboratories Limited,

ITTA/275/2012HC Telangana10 Jul 2013

condoned. Otherwise also, the minor age of helpless claimant in these appeals is certainly a sufficient cause for delay in filing Crossobjections. Therefore, Civil Application No. 14171 of 2017 and Civil Application No. 2757 of 2018 are disposed of as allowed and Crossobjections filed by claimant are taken on record. 16. After hearing both the sides, following points arise

Commissioner of Income TAx vs. Ongole Milk Line Pvt Ltd

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. Prasad Film Laboratories Limited,

Commissioner of Income TAx vs. Ongole Milk Line Pvt Ltd

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. Prasad Film Laboratories Limited,

THE COMMIR.OF INCOME-TAX A.P.-II.HYD. vs. MOHD.SIDDIQ PROP.M/S.HUMA ATCHANDRADIO.

M/s. Vodafone Mobile Services Limited, vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc.,

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s. Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.