Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai534 Kolkata425 Chennai241 Delhi167 Ahmedabad152 Pune152 Hyderabad128 Chandigarh99 Bangalore90 Jaipur89 Raipur73 Surat66 Amritsar48 Rajkot47 Visakhapatnam40 Calcutta39 Cuttack38 Nagpur34 Lucknow26 Indore25 Guwahati17 Patna16 SC14 Cochin11 Varanasi10 Allahabad8 Karnataka7 Jodhpur6 Dehradun5 Telangana4 Panaji3 Agra2 Jabalpur1 Andhra Pradesh1 Himachal Pradesh1 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 1483 Section 143(3)3 Section 1543 Section 1632 Section 2602 Section 260A2 Section 1472 Addition to Income2

The Commissioner of Income Tax [Central] vs. Smt P Sujana

The appeal stands disposed of as indicated above

ITTA/280/2015HC Telangana16 Jul 2015

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 260Section 260A

carry forward of the loss, further observing that the assessee had not moved any application to CBDT for condonation of delay

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. M/s. V.Dhana Reddy AND Co.,

ITTA/137/2017HC Telangana

14 Nov 2017

Bench: C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

For Appellant: - National Insurance Co. Ltd. Lucknow Thru. AssttFor Respondent: - Gaurav Sharma And Anr

Section 163Section 166Section 173

condonation of delay under a wrong provision of law will not vitiate the application. 18. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Pankajbhai Rameshbhai Zalavadiya Vs. Jethabhai Kalabhai Zalavadiya; (2017) 9 SCC 700, has held that it is by now well settled that a mere wrong mention of the provision in the application would not prohibit a party

The Director of Income Tax, (Exemptions) vs. Royal Education Society

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITTA/392/2016HC Telangana20 Oct 2016

Bench: ANIS,SANJAY KUMAR

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 260A

carry on the business of banking by Reserve Bank of India under Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The assessee filed the return of income under Section 143(1) of the Act for the Assessment Year 2007-08 on 31.10.2007 and declared total income of Rs.40,77,27,150/-. However, no order of assessment was passed under Section

M/S MAQSOD AND CO HYDERABAD vs. THE COMMNER OF INCOME TAX HYD

ITTA/22/2001HC Telangana27 Jun 2013

For Appellant: - Navneet Nain Alias Navneet AgarwalFor Respondent: - New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And Another

loss to him and caused deprivation of his earnings as a contractor in their entirety. 5. Nain, therefore, claimed damages in the total sum of Rs.27,89,100/- setting forth in the claim petition damages, separately under the principal heads of pecuniary and general damages. 4 6. At the time of institution of the claim petition, Nain was residing