BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai570Delhi370Bangalore255Ahmedabad98Kolkata80Jaipur69Chennai64Hyderabad49Pune18Raipur17Rajkot16Nagpur15Indore12Amritsar11Karnataka11Chandigarh10Lucknow8Surat8Visakhapatnam4Jodhpur4Patna4Telangana4SC3Agra3Jabalpur3Guwahati2Ranchi1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 260A6Section 234B4Section 1433Section 2602Section 132B2

The Commissioner of Income Tax - III, vs. M/s. Suven Pharmaceuticals Limited,

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/677/2006HC Telangana21 Mar 2012
Section 115JSection 143Section 208Section 260A

capital gains; or (b) income of the nature referred to   in sub­clause (ix) of clause (24) of  section 2, and the assessee has paid the whole of the  amount of tax payable in respect of income  referred to in clause (a) or clause (b), as  the case may be, had such income been a part  of   the   total   income

The Commissioner of Income tax vs. M/s. ragamayee bAr AND Restaurant,

The appeals stand dismissed

ITTA/203/2010HC Telangana30 Nov 2010

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 132BSection 234BSection 234D

234C. Interest for deferment of advance tax. (1) [Where in any financial year,— (a) the company which is liable to pay advance tax under section 208 has failed to pay such tax or— (i) the advance tax paid by the company on its current income on or before the 15th day of June is less than fifteen per cent

The Commissioner of Income- Tax - V, vs. M/s. Krishnaveni Constructions,

ITTA/37/2010HC Telangana22 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 143Section 260Section 260A

234C and 234D of the Act further disallowing foreign exchange loss. The assessee preferred appeal before the CIT[A] which came to be partly allowed. Hence, the assessee as well as the Revenue both preferred appeals before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has restored the first four issues to the file of the Assessing Authority and dismissed the appeal

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

ITTA/621/2017HC Telangana23 Aug 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 260A

section. Nonetheless, as an overall matter, GE is correct that in some instances, ITAT‟s characterization of certain conversations appears to overstate the importance of the activities in India (for e.g. e- mail chain on Reliance-GT Exhaust Height; e-mail chain on confirmation of RIL PO No. DG8/3389741). Nevertheless, in many other instances, ITAT‟s decision is sound