The Commissioner of Income tax vs. M/s. ragamayee bAr AND Restaurant,

The appeals stand dismissed

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

234B. Interest for defaults in payment of advance tax.- (1) Subject to the other provisions of this section, where, in any financial year, an assessee who is liable to pay advance tax under section 208 has failed to pay such tax or, where the advance tax paid by such assessee under the provisions of section 210 is less than ninety

Commissioner of Income Tax, Guntur vs. Agricultural Market Committee, Sattenapalli

In the result, the order of the income tax appellate tribunal

Bench: GODA RAGHURAM,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

234B and 234D of the Act on the facts and circumstances of the case? 2. Facts leading to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of manufacture and 4 export of readymade garments. The assessee for the Assessment year 2008-09 filed the return of income declaring total

Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), vs. M/s Country Club Inda Limited

234B of the Act and consequently, the same is not being considered. 35. The first three questions framed in the aforesaid appeals relate to the dispute whether the Assessee has a PE in India and the fourth question relates to the issue of attribution of income to the Assessee‘s alleged PE in India. ITA 666/2014 & Ors. Page

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

section. Nonetheless, as an overall matter, GE is correct that in some instances, ITAT‟s characterization of certain conversations appears to overstate the importance of the activities in India (for e.g. e- mail chain on Reliance-GT Exhaust Height; e-mail chain on confirmation of RIL PO No. DG8/3389741). Nevertheless, in many other instances, ITAT‟s decision is sound