BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “capital gains”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,720Delhi5,567Chennai2,161Bangalore2,138Kolkata1,751Ahmedabad1,150Jaipur806Hyderabad782Pune714Chandigarh377Indore356Surat260Cochin230Nagpur205Raipur202Visakhapatnam151Rajkot151Lucknow150Amritsar105Agra90Patna87SC75Panaji71Dehradun67Guwahati59Calcutta58Cuttack57Karnataka53Jodhpur50Ranchi39Jabalpur38Allahabad23Kerala16Telangana11Varanasi10Rajasthan9Orissa7Punjab & Haryana6Andhra Pradesh2Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 260A11Section 2608Addition to Income5Section 54F3Section 1322Section 1512Exemption2Deduction2

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. M/s Pokarna Limited

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/273/2012HC Telangana18 Feb 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260A

capital gains. This classification under distinct heads of income profits and gains is made having regard to the sources from which income is derived. Income-tax is undoubtedly levied on the total taxable income of the taxpayer and the tax levied is a single tax on the aggregate taxable receipts from all the sources; it is not a collection

M/S.R.S.RANGADAS vs. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are disposed of, with no order as to costs

ITTA/406/2005HC Telangana19 Oct 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 2(47)
Section 271(1)(c)
Section 45(1)
Section 48
Section 54F

capital gains from transfer/sale of one lakh equity shares of NIIT would be assessable in the AY 1999-2000 and accordingly claim for deduction under Section 54F would be considered in the said year. Total taxable income was assessed at Rs.2,38,02,380/- on ITA Nos. 405/2005, 406/2005 & 389/2007 Page 4 of 26 account of certain additions

Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), vs. M/s. Vipanchi Chit Fund Ltd.,

The appeal is dismissed

ITTA/569/2012HC Telangana18 Feb 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

For Appellant: Mr N. P. Sahni with Mr Ruchesh SinhaFor Respondent: Mr A. Sharma with Mr Manu K. Giri
Section 2(47)(v)Section 260ASection 53A

addition of the said sum of ` 3,07,82,342/- by holding it as profit on sale of land which was taxable under the head ‘profits and gains of business or profession’ and not by way of capital gains. The Commissioner of Income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III, vs. M/S. SAVIJANA SEA FOODS PVT. LTD.,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITTA/55/2010HC Telangana20 Dec 2024

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

Section 260

capital gains in their books of accounts as well as income tax returns after indexation of the cost of acquisition. This was an additional

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sri Nama Nageshwar Rao

ITTA/23/2021HC Telangana09 Oct 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

income on account of being long term capital gain. 3. A search was conducted u/s. 132 on 18th November, 2015 at the premises of the Assessee {being Anand Kumar Jain (HUF), its coparceners and relatives} as well as at the premises of one Pradeep Kumar Jindal. During the search, statement of Pradeep Kumar Jindal was recorded on oath

Kuchipudi Krishna Kishore vs. The DCIT

Accordingly the appeals deserves to be allowed by setting aside the impugned

ITTA/291/2007HC Telangana03 May 2024

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,N.TUKARAMJI

For Appellant: SRI A.V.A. SIVA KARTIKEYA on behalf ofFor Respondent: SRI ARVIND rep Ms. SUNDARI R PISUPATI
Section 260

gain controiling interest. For that cause he had taken loan and the payment of interest, is for continuance of the business. Thus, the factual position is establishing that the interest has been paid by the assessee towards the capital borrowed investment for the prospect of business. ln addition though inconsequential for avairing benefit under this provision it has been substantiated

M/S NATIONAL ACADEMY OF CONSTRUCTION vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX

ITTA/293/2014HC Telangana31 Aug 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

For Appellant: SRI S' RAVIFor Respondent: Ms' K' MAMATA
Section 151Section 260Section 260A

Income Tax Act would not had been attracted in the instant case. It was also the contention of the learned counsel for the aPpellant that even otherwise, the amount of Rs. 1.5 crores spent by the appellant towards HITEX was the amount collected by way of membership fees and which again is a capital receipt and therefore both, section

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. M/s. Sanghi Textiles Limited

The appeal is allowed setting aside

ITTA/551/2010HC Telangana30 Jan 2026

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

For Respondent: sri G.v.Ambeshwar, counser representing
Section 260A

gains advantage by the spending of the said amount, it should be looked upon as revenue receipt and not capital receipt. 12. Learned senior standing counsel has also placed reliance on the case of commtssioner of Income Tqx u. ponni sugars qnd chemicats Ltd3 wherein the Hon,lcle Supreme court has reiterated the principre of 'purpose test'laid down

The Commissioner of Income-tax(Exemptions) vs. WarangalWarangal Diocese Society

The appeals are dismissed, along with pending

ITTA/268/2019HC Telangana16 Nov 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,N.TUKARAMJI

Section 37

Capital Territory of Delhi were banned due to which there was a shortage of the mining materials and the rates of various raw materials were hiked by the mine lease holders. Another letter was sent by the Respondent to Appellant in the same regard showing the current and previous market rates and requesting the Appellant to increase the rates accordingly

AVANTI FEEDS LTD., vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

The appeal is dismissed, and the stay petition

ITTA/56/2011HC Telangana06 Jan 2026

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

Section 260A

INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VS MEGAPODE VYAPAR PVT. LTD. BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR Date : 8th January, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Aryak Dutt, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. ...for Appellant Mr. Saurabh Bagaria, Adv. Mr. Rites Goel, Adv. ...for Respondent The Court: Revenue has raised the following substantial questions

M/s Durga Granites, vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 1,

ITTA/30/2023HC Telangana04 Sept 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

gain as General Manager (HR&A) "Bidyut Unnayan Bhaban", Plot No. 3/C, LA Block, Sector-III, P.O. - Salt Lake City, P.S.- Bidhannagar, District- Kolkata, West Bengal, PIN – 700106 ..........Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, having its office at Yojna Bhawan, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi (Jharkhand