BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “bogus purchases”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,818Delhi1,330Jaipur439Kolkata429Chennai350Bangalore188Ahmedabad183Chandigarh141Hyderabad104Pune98Indore95Surat88Nagpur74Cochin62Amritsar58Raipur53Rajkot50Guwahati43Calcutta39Visakhapatnam38Lucknow35Allahabad34Patna34Jodhpur28Cuttack27Agra25Ranchi13Dehradun8Varanasi8Karnataka6Telangana5Jabalpur4SC3Orissa2Panaji2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1486Addition to Income4Section 260A2Section 1322Section 5A2Section 32Section 142(1)2

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Hycons Infrastructure (India) Ltd.

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/411/2013HC Telangana25 Sept 2013
Section 3Section 3(3)Section 5ASection 5A(1)

Income Tax, Excise for a period of 10 years from the commencem ent of production. State Government would be requested to grant exemptions in re spect of Sales Tax and Municipal Tax. ii. Industries located in the growth centers would also be given Capital Investm ent Subsidy at the rate of 15% of their investment in plant and machinery, subje

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shri Byru Venkateswarlu

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/341/2005HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 271(1)(c)

bogus purchases of cut goods shown in the name of the said two parties, it is to stated that the sources of purchase are not explained as these parties have not been produced for my examination and that the same are not available at the given addresses. It is the assessee itself who introduced own money as invested

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sri Nama Nageshwar Rao

ITTA/23/2021HC Telangana09 Oct 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

purchased shares of an unlisted private company in 2010. This unlisted company then merged with another unlisted company, M/s Focus Industrial Resources Ltd. and shares of this merged entity were allotted to the Assessee. Subsequently, the merged entity allotted further bonus shares to the Assessee and thereafter it was listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Assessee sold these shares

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Agricultural Market Committee

ITTA/413/2011HC Telangana17 Nov 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,SANJAY KUMAR

For Appellant: - Suresh Kumar SheetlaniFor Respondent: - Income Tax Officer-1 (3)
Section 133Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 282

bogus and unexplained income of the assessee from undisclosed sources vide assessment order dated 5th December, 2006 under Sections 144 and 147 of the Act. 7. Aggrieved by the said order, the assessee had filed an appeal before the first appellate authority. The first appellant authority vide order dated 9th September, 2009 cancelled the said assessment order, declaring the same

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. M/s. Labhan Finanve Limited

ITTA/484/2010HC Telangana02 Feb 2012

Bench: The Hon'Ble Court Of First Class Magistrate In Cmp No.3644/2008. Annexure Ii: True Copy Of The Statement Filed By The Petitioner Before The Hon'Ble Court Of First Class Magistrate. Annexure Iii: True Copy Of The Survey Report. Annexure Iv: True Copy Of The Statement Filed By The Petitioner Before The Hon'Ble Court Of First Class Magistrate. Annexure V: True Copy Of The Order Of The Judicial First Class Magistrate'S Court I, Rnakulam Dated 23.6.2009. // True Copy // Tks P.S. To Judge

Section 451

purchased and therefore, they claimed for custody of the gold ornaments for the purpose of enquiry under the provisions of the Income Tax Act. To lend support to the claim for interim custody the first respondent in the latter Crl.M.C. produced 9 documents before the court below. After hearing the three petitions they were disposed of as per Annexure