BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “bogus purchases”+ Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,680Delhi812Kolkata498Jaipur372Chennai317Ahmedabad296Bangalore184Indore124Pune111Karnataka109Chandigarh107Hyderabad99Surat71Cochin61Nagpur49Lucknow47Calcutta45Raipur43Guwahati32Cuttack32Rajkot29Ranchi21Jodhpur17Amritsar12Visakhapatnam10Agra9Patna8Telangana6Varanasi5Panaji2Orissa2Jabalpur2SC2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Dehradun1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 260A3Addition to Income3Section 1322

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. M/S Gulf Oil Corporation Pvt. Ltd.,

ITTA/195/2008HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

gain. 8.5. The   assessee,   being   aggrieved   and  dissatisfied with the assessment order, filed  Page 5 of 41 C/TAXAP/194/2008 JUDGMENT an appeal before the CIT (A) contending that  the entire loss has wrongly been denied to be  set   off   against   the   other   incomes   of   the  assessee.   The   assessee   made   several  submissions before the CIT (A). The CIT (A)  thereafter  allowed

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s.Jayalakshmi Chits

ITTA/211/2008HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

gain. 8.5. The   assessee,   being   aggrieved   and  dissatisfied with the assessment order, filed  Page 5 of 41 C/TAXAP/194/2008 JUDGMENT an appeal before the CIT (A) contending that  the entire loss has wrongly been denied to be  set   off   against   the   other   incomes   of   the  assessee.   The   assessee   made   several  submissions before the CIT (A). The CIT (A)  thereafter  allowed

The Commissioner of Income Tax - VI vs. M/s. Manikanta Iron AND Hardware

ITTA/196/2008HC Telangana02 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

gain. 8.5. The   assessee,   being   aggrieved   and  dissatisfied with the assessment order, filed  Page 5 of 41 C/TAXAP/194/2008 JUDGMENT an appeal before the CIT (A) contending that  the entire loss has wrongly been denied to be  set   off   against   the   other   incomes   of   the  assessee.   The   assessee   made   several  submissions before the CIT (A). The CIT (A)  thereafter  allowed

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sri Nama Nageshwar Rao

ITTA/23/2021HC Telangana09 Oct 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

purchased shares of an unlisted private company in 2010. This unlisted company then merged with another unlisted company, M/s Focus Industrial Resources Ltd. and shares of this merged entity were allotted to the Assessee. Subsequently, the merged entity allotted further bonus shares to the Assessee and thereafter it was listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Assessee sold these shares

AVANTI FEEDS LTD., vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

The appeal is dismissed, and the stay petition

ITTA/56/2011HC Telangana06 Jan 2026

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

Section 260A

purchase and sale 2 of penny stocks i.e. BLUE CIRCLE & CCL INTERNATIONAL featuring in the list of ‘Bogus Capital Loss Claims’ information data provided by the Directorate of Investigation, Kolkata? ii. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Learned Tribunal was justified in law in allowing the appeal of the assessee and deleting the disallowance

The Commissioner of Income Tax -III vs. Sri T.C. Reddy

The appeal stands dismissed

ITTA/577/2011HC Telangana28 Feb 2012

capital of the company. This fact was brought to the notice of the assessee vide order sheet entry dated 29.12.2009. No satisfactory reply has been filed. It is therefore, disallowed from the revenue expenses claimed by the assessee. Penalty proceedings u/s271(1)(c) r.w 274 of the Income-tax Act for concealment and furnishing of inaccurate particulars are initiated separately