The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. M/s. Celestial Laboratories Limited,

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

TDS). The assessee thereupon approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to 8 as 'the Tribunal' for short) by filing appeals against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). During the pendency of the appeals before the Tribunal, a division bench of this court by order dated 14.03.2012, set aside the order passed by the learned

Commissioner of Income Tax [TDS] vs. Sri VAraha Laxmi Nrusimha Swamy DEvastanam

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

70 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 701 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 10/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SR.MARY LUCITA CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOVILVATTOM ROAD, ERNAKULAM

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. Swapna Lahari Pvt Ltd.,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

70 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 701 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 10/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SR.MARY LUCITA CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOVILVATTOM ROAD, ERNAKULAM

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Smt G Sailaja

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

70 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 701 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 10/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SR.MARY LUCITA CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOVILVATTOM ROAD, ERNAKULAM

The Commissioner of Income Tax -1 vs. Harmahendar Singh Bagga

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

70 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 701 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 10/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SR.MARY LUCITA CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOVILVATTOM ROAD, ERNAKULAM

Commissioner of Income TAx-II, Hyderabad vs. M/s. Sri Balaji Bio MAss Power Pvt. Ltd.,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

70 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 701 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 10/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SR.MARY LUCITA CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOVILVATTOM ROAD, ERNAKULAM

Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. The Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd.,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

70 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 701 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 10/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SR.MARY LUCITA CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOVILVATTOM ROAD, ERNAKULAM

Commissioner of Income Tax-1, vs. Agricultural Market Committee,

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

70,881/- along {2} DB INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.235/2011 & THREE OTHER INCOME TAX APPEALS with interest thereon amounting to Rs.44,776/-, on account of TDS on the amount paid as service tax. The matter relates to the Financial Year 2005-06. The assessee preferred an appeal, which was allowed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-III, Jaipur (for short

M/s Modi Builders AND Realtors (P) Ltd., vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income tax,

The appeals are disposed of

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

70,01,266/- was made. (v) Interest of Rs.18,25,790/- had accrued on balance amount of Rs.36,51,579/- from 29th March, 1995 till 1st June, 1999. (vi) Thus in all, interest of Rs.1,60,30,495/- had accrued and payable but was not paid when the two refunds were issued. (Rs.1,42,04,705/- had accrued and should

The Commissioner of Income Tax - VI vs. Sri Danda Dharanidhar

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

70. In the eventuality that any of the agents have not yet paid taxes on the supplementary commission, the Revenue will be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law under the IT Act for recovery of shortfall in TDS from the airlines. However, we limit the ability to levy penalties against the assessees in light of Section

Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. M/s. Kura Homes Pvt. Ltd.,

Appeal stands allowed

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 166 of the M.V. Act. Learned Tribunal, on perusal of the documents brought on record and after hearing counsel for the parties and upon going through the written statement as well as other documents, framed following issues for proper and just adjudication of the case:- i) Whether this claim case is maintainable in the present form

Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Hyderabad. vs. M/s.Trinity Advanced Software Labs (P) Ltd.,

The appeal is disposed of in

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde Regular First Appeal No. 179 Of 2013 (Dec/Pos) Between:

SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE: The parties hereby submit that with the intervention of the family members, well wishers and friends the above appeal has been compromised between the parties under the following terms and conditions. 1. The appellants in the above appeal are the defendants and the respondents is the plaintiff in the suit filed before