Commissioner of Income Tax [TDS] vs. Sri VAraha Laxmi Nrusimha Swamy DEvastanam

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 510 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 345/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: THE PROVINCIAL SUPERIOR PAVANATHMA PROVINCE, CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOZHIPPALLY, KOTHAMANGALAM

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. Swapna Lahari Pvt Ltd.,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 510 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 345/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: THE PROVINCIAL SUPERIOR PAVANATHMA PROVINCE, CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOZHIPPALLY, KOTHAMANGALAM

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Smt G Sailaja

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 510 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 345/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: THE PROVINCIAL SUPERIOR PAVANATHMA PROVINCE, CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOZHIPPALLY, KOTHAMANGALAM

The Commissioner of Income Tax -1 vs. Harmahendar Singh Bagga

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 510 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 345/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: THE PROVINCIAL SUPERIOR PAVANATHMA PROVINCE, CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOZHIPPALLY, KOTHAMANGALAM

Commissioner of Income TAx-II, Hyderabad vs. M/s. Sri Balaji Bio MAss Power Pvt. Ltd.,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 510 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 345/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: THE PROVINCIAL SUPERIOR PAVANATHMA PROVINCE, CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOZHIPPALLY, KOTHAMANGALAM

Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. The Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd.,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 510 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 345/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: THE PROVINCIAL SUPERIOR PAVANATHMA PROVINCE, CARMELITE PROVINCIAL HOUSE, KOZHIPPALLY, KOTHAMANGALAM

M/s Modi Builders AND Realtors (P) Ltd., vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income tax,

The appeals are disposed of

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

57,302/- from 1st April, 1997 upto the date of refund/payment and Rs.96,258/- from 1st June, 1999 upto the date of refund/payment. Interest, it is claimed, is payable under Section 244A of the Act. 4. The contention of the Revenue is that this would amount to paying interest on interest and this would be contrary to Section 244A

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s Polisetty Somasundaram,

57,286/- was made as the assessee failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness of the parties from whom the alleged loans were declared. (4) No evidence was furnished to prove the genuineness of advances of Rs.10,66,96,566/- from customers, as such out of the said amount, an amount of Rs.2,00,00,000/- was added to the returned

Director of Income Tax ( International Taxation) vs. M/s. JDH International LLC,

Appeal is partly allowed with certain modification and the multiplier is reduced from 11

Bench: The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Date Of Reserved 25.10.2025 Date Of Pronounced 06.01.2026 Coram The Hon'Ble Ms.Justice R.Poornima Cma(Md)No.573 Of 2013 & Mp(Md)No.1 Of 2013 Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., South Main Veedhi, Thanjavur Town & Munsif, By Its Branch Manager : Appellant/2Nd Respondent Vs. 1.V.Veluthai 2.N.Sivakumar 3.N.Rajakumar : Respondents 1 To 3/Petitioners 4.Senthilkumar : 4Th Respondent/R1 Prayer:-Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Is Filed Under Section 173 Of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Against The Award Dated 08/08/2002 & Made In Mcop No.518 Of 2002 On The File Of The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Ftc-1, Thanjavur. For Appellant : Mr.E.Chandrasekaran For R1 To R3 : Mr.R.Giridharan (No Appearance) 1/12 Https://Www.Mhc.Tn.Gov.In/Judis

TDS 6839. Thereafter, he realised that the lorry bearing registration No.TDS 6839 was not involved in the accident. 14. His evidence was corroborated by the P.W.3, Nagarajan who accompanied the deceased clearly stated that on 06.05.2002, when he returning from Thiruvayaru along with deceased Nallakumar, the vehicle bearing registration No.TNL 3074 was driven by its driver in a rash