BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 272clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi331Mumbai264Karnataka105Bangalore88Kolkata51Raipur45Chennai35Ahmedabad25Pune25Hyderabad24Jaipur17Visakhapatnam13Indore10Chandigarh9Nagpur6Jodhpur4Rajkot4Surat3Telangana3Cuttack2Lucknow2Guwahati2Allahabad2Kerala2Patna1Cochin1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 2606Section 14A2

M/s.V.R.Farms Pvt Ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/272/2008HC Telangana28 Nov 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

272 ITR 58 (Cal). 15. Lastly, it was argued that hardship or inequity is no ground for not charging interest under sections 234B and 234C before allowing MAT credit. It was contended that it is a well established principle that equity has no place in tax laws. It was therefore urged that the questions be answered in favour

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-TDS vs. M/S.IDEA CELLULAR LTD

Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn

ITTA/263/2018HC Telangana19 Sept 2024

Bench: SUJOY PAUL,NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Section 260

TDS, Hyderabad. ...AppellanURespondent AND l\l/s. ldea C:llular Ltd., H.No.5-9-62, KLK Estates, Fateh Maidan Road, Hyderabad ... Res po n de nUAppe ll ant |.T.T.A.No. 272 of 2018 lncome Tax l'r bunal Appeal Under Section

Commissioner of Income Tax-III, vs. M/s Sree Rayalaseema Green Energy Limited,

ITTA/439/2013HC Telangana19 Sept 2013
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)

272 (Del.). Further to invoke Rule 8D, the Assessing Officer has to first record a finding that he was not satisfied with the correctness of the claim for expenditure made by the assessee in relation to income, which did not form part of the total income under the Act. No such satisfaction has been recorded by the Assessing Officer