5 results for “TDS”+ Section 263(2)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
The appeals are dismissed
Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
TDS 4,26,357 4,26,357 Less Advance Tax -- -- 24,19,743 18,71,668 Add: Interest u/s 234B 2,31,376 1,64,666 Add: Interest u/s 234C 1,52,748 1,18,149 Tax + interest payable 28,03,867 21,54,483 Less: MAT credit 5,48,075 -- Total Tax + interest liability
Appeal stands dismissed
Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
TDS”) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act of 1961”) dated 22.03.2024, was set aside in the appeal preferred by the assessee. 2
The appeals are disposed of
263 or section 264 or an order of the Settlement Commission under sub-section (4) of section 245D, the amount on which interest was ITA Nos. 167/2012 & 168/2012 Page 9 of 17 payable under sub-section (1) has been increased or reduced, as the case may be, the interest shall be increased or reduced accordingly, and in a case where
Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn
Bench: SUJOY PAUL,NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
263 ot 2018 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act,196'l against the Order dated 25.10.2017 passed in ITA No. 1 665/HYD/20 1 4 for the Assessment Year 2007 -2008 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 05.08.2014 passed
In the result, the appeal is allowed, as follows;
Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Section 173 of M.V. Act, aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment dated 09.11.2015 in MVOP No.51/2013 on the file of the Court of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum District Judge, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. Between: 1. Rudraraju Rukmini, W/o.late Sri Venkatalakshmi Narasimha Raju, Hindu, Occ: Housewife, R/o.Vuyyurivari Meraka, Near Antarvedipalem, Sakhinetipalli - 533 251, East Godavari District. 2. Pericherla Lakshmi
