BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 234clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi551Mumbai400Bangalore160Karnataka109Chennai99Kolkata65Pune57Jaipur40Ahmedabad35Hyderabad19Chandigarh16Indore13Amritsar13Cuttack12Cochin11Nagpur10Visakhapatnam7Guwahati7Lucknow6Rajkot5SC3Kerala3Telangana3Raipur3Dehradun2Patna2Ranchi2Surat2Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 2604Section 194J4Section 260A2Section 2012Section 201(1)2Deduction2

M/s.V.R.Farms Pvt Ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/272/2008HC Telangana28 Nov 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

234(1) defines the term ―assessed tax‖ to mean the tax determined under section 143(1) or upon a regular assessment as reduced by the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. M/s. Celestial Laboratories Limited,

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITTA/303/2013HC Telangana17 Jul 2013
Section 133ASection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)
Section 260
Section 260A

234 (SC) and ‘CIT VS. TARA AGENCIES’, (2007) 162 TAXMAN 337 (SC). SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE: 10. On the other hand, learned counsel for the revenue submitted that Section 194J refers to “person” and therefore, includes the assessee and cannot be confined to individuals alone. It is also pointed out that definition of “professional service” in Section 194J

The Commissioner of Income Tax I vs. Mesmer Technologies Ltd

The appeals are allowed in part

ITTA/673/2016HC Telangana15 Dec 2016

Bench: SANJAY KUMAR,M.S.K.JAISWAL

Section 12ASection 194JSection 260Section 260A

234 (SC), the Hon’ble Apex Court based on the decision of Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd., vs. CIT reported in (1999) 105 Taxman 742 (SC) has held thus: - 21 - “9. …………. Therefore, as stated earlier, if the contention of the Department was accepted it would mean obliteration of the expression "sum chargeable under the provisions of the Act" from Section