BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 14A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,085Delhi587Chennai495Bangalore245Kolkata239Ahmedabad108Hyderabad50Raipur38Pune36Visakhapatnam34Ranchi31Karnataka29Chandigarh23Jaipur21Indore17Lucknow15Cuttack10Surat10Rajkot9Amritsar8Guwahati7Calcutta5Varanasi4Cochin4Panaji3Nagpur3Telangana3Dehradun2Punjab & Haryana1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 14A4Disallowance3Section 2602Section 260A2Section 36(1)2Section 402Section 194H2Section 115J2Section 2(17)2TDS

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s.Midwest Granites Private Limited

Appeal stands dismissed accordingly

ITTA/362/2018HC Telangana16 Aug 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 115JSection 14ASection 194HSection 2(17)Section 260Section 260ASection 36(1)Section 40

1) (viia) and also (viii) by relying upon its earlier orders passed for the assessment years 2009-10 to 2011-12? 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Tribunal is right in law in setting aside the disallowance of expenditure incurred on earning exempt income under Section 14A read with Rule

2

Commissioner of Income Tax-III, vs. M/s Sree Rayalaseema Green Energy Limited,

ITTA/439/2013HC Telangana19 Sept 2013
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)

14A. The tribunal has held that the aforesaid disallowance was reasonable. The Assessing Officer had disallowed an amount of Rs.69,65,686/- and held this was the reasonable expenditure incurred to earn dividend income of Rs.3,95,439/-. In view of the facts noticed above, the contention of the revenue is rather far-fetched, if not perverse and illogical

PRL COMMISSOER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRISURAM VENKATESWARA REDDY

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue fails and is

ITTA/400/2018HC Telangana27 Aug 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 115JSection 14ASection 194HSection 2(17)Section 260Section 260ASection 40

1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in setting aside disallowance made under the head investment portfolio by following earlier decisions which has not reached finality even when the assessing authority rightly made disallowance by holding that irrespective of RBI guidelines were applicable to the assessee for the purposes