The Commissioner of Income Tax V vs. M/s. S.L. Enterprises,

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

TDS), CIRCLE – 18(1), BENGALURU. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 20.11.2009 PASSED IN ITA NO.803/BNG/2009, FOR THE ASSSESSMENT YEAR 2005- 2 2006, PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO; FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATE THEREIN

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. SOMA ENTERPRISES LTD

The appeal is disposed off accordingly

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

4 amounting to Rs.8,41,36,636/- which includes depreciation of the building block of Rs.4,92,10,011/-. The Assessing Officer came to the conclusion that the asseessee is not entitled to claim deduction of any amount twice, while arriving at the income of the concern. Accordingly, the depreciation claimed by the assessee in respect of the buildings amounting

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Agricultural Market committee,

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,SANJAY KUMAR

TDS in lieu of services received by them and for the services received by them was liable to pay tax within the meaning of Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. 5. However counsel for the respondent Mr. Jhanwar contended that the issue is concluded in view of the following decisions : 1. Commissioner of Income