BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 139clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,127Delhi1,001Bangalore448Chennai403Kolkata324Jaipur181Hyderabad155Karnataka145Pune122Ahmedabad122Chandigarh121Indore97Cochin89Raipur70Visakhapatnam56Nagpur41Cuttack34Lucknow32Rajkot29Guwahati26Amritsar26Surat20Agra19Patna16Jodhpur15SC8Dehradun6Telangana5Kerala4Jabalpur4Varanasi4Allahabad2Panaji2Ranchi2Calcutta2

Key Topics

Section 2606Section 194J3Section 403TDS3Addition to Income2Deduction2

Commissioner of Income tax-V, vs. M/s. INTRACK INC,

ITTA/590/2013HC Telangana06 Dec 2013
Section 260

TDS deductible and deducted in the last month of previous year if was not paid till the due date of filing of return under sub-section (1) of Section 139

M/s.V.R.Farms Pvt Ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/272/2008HC Telangana28 Nov 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

TDS 4,26,357 4,26,357 Less Advance Tax -- -- 24,19,743 18,71,668 Add: Interest u/s 234B 2,31,376 1,64,666 Add: Interest u/s 234C 1,52,748 1,18,149 Tax + interest payable 28,03,867 21,54,483 Less: MAT credit 5,48,075 -- Total Tax + interest liability

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. SOMA ENTERPRISES LTD

The appeal is disposed off accordingly

ITTA/209/2010HC Telangana16 Jul 2025

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 194JSection 260Section 40

TDS cannot be disallowed u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act as the provisions of Section 11 of the Act was applicable to the assessee? ii. Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that professional fee of Rs.45,69,998/- paid to Apollo Hospital for managing and running BGS Medical Foundation would not attract Section 194J

The Commissioner of Income Tax V vs. M/s. S.L. Enterprises,

ITTA/121/2010HC Telangana22 Mar 2016

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 260A

TDS), CIRCLE – 18(1), BENGALURU. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 20.11.2009 PASSED IN ITA NO.803/BNG/2009, FOR THE ASSSESSMENT YEAR 2005- 2 2006, PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO; FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATE THEREIN

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Agricultural Market committee,

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/422/2011HC Telangana17 Nov 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,SANJAY KUMAR

Section 192Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 28Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS in lieu of services received by them and for the services received by them was liable to pay tax within the meaning of Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. 5. However counsel for the respondent Mr. Jhanwar contended that the issue is concluded in view of the following decisions : 1. Commissioner of Income