BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai271Delhi171Chennai93Kolkata61Bangalore60Raipur37Pune18Jaipur16Hyderabad14Lucknow12Ahmedabad9Nagpur8Karnataka5Visakhapatnam3Chandigarh3SC3Surat2Dehradun2Telangana1Calcutta1Cuttack1Indore1Jodhpur1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 2635Section 374Section 115B4Section 143(3)2Section 402Deduction2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. M/S ABS EXPORTS, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 165/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 Apr 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 37Section 37(1)Section 43B

house property and has thereby ignored the essence of Chapter IV of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which deals with income and deductions which ore to be allowed respective to their nature and under the similar heads of income. c) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in Jaw the Ld. CTT(A) erred in deleting

SHIVAM DEVELOPERS,GODADRA vs. ITO, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 76/SRT/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.76/Srt/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Physical Court Hearing) Shivam Developers, Vs. The Pr. Cit-2, 141, Khodiyar Residency, Surat. Godadra, Surat-395010. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acffs4002D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, Ca Respondent By Shri Ritesh Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 06/10/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 11/11/2022

Section 115Section 115BSection 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 263Section 37Section 40Section 69A

43B. Hence, the assessee firm has not claimed anything not genuine. Payment of service tax on the declared income is implied and mandatory and deduction of the same cannot be denied because the same is a legal expenses paid to the government and there is nothing like a false claim or afterthought of claim (b) Regarding the remuneration to partners