Search: condonation of delay

24 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(1)53 Disallowance22 Section 36(1)(va)19 Addition to Income19 Condonation of Delay17 Section 3611 TDS11 Section 43B9 Deduction9

RIDDHI SIDDHI PRINTS PVT LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGULURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 150/SRT/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.147 & 234/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) (Virtual Court Hearing) Rekha R. Shokla, Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, G-3, Deepanjali Appartment, Sai Bangalore. Krupa Society, No.4-Airport Road, Nani Daman. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bgyps2563M (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.150/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) Riddhi Siddhi Prints Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, 75-1 & 75-2, Gidc, Pandesara, Bangalore. Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaccr7050C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.160/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2019-20) Chinco Textiles, Vs. The Acit, Cpc, Plot No.104, Road No.7, Gidc Bangalore. Sachin, Surat-394230. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaefc0028N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.201 & 202/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Shree Laxminarayan Synthetics, Vs. The Dcit, Circle-2(1)(1), Plot No.275/2, Gidc, Pandesara, Surat. Surat, Gujarat-394221. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aakfs5319N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.224 & 225/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Tirupati Prints, Vs. The Adit, Cpc, S. No.207, Plot No.37 To 40, Bangalore. Bamroli Taluka: Choryasi, Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabft4240J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(1)Section 36

condone the delay and admit assessee`s appeal for adjudication on merits. 5. The facts of the case which can be stated quite shortly are as follows. In all these ten appeals, the solitary issue involved is that assessees have not deposited employees contribution to provident fund and ESI within the time limit allowed under the Act. Therefore, Assessing Officer

Showing 1–20 of 24 · Page 1 of 2

RIDDHI SIDDHI PRINTS PVT LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGULURU

RIDDHI SIDDHI PRINTS PVT LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGULURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

CHINCO TEXTILES,SURAT vs. ASSTT. DIRETOR OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE(CPC), BENGALURU

REKHA R. SHUKLA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC, BANGLURU

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

REKHA R SHUKLA,NANI DAMAN vs. DCIT,CPC,BANGLURU, BANGAALURU

U. P. SINGH AND CO.,SURAT vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

ZENITEX,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

SALONI ENGINEERING WORKS,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8, VAPI

VYASHKUMAR INDRALAL MISHRA,SILVASSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 7, VAPI

UNNAT ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1)(4), SURAT

HARMONY YARNS PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, SURAT

JASHUBEN DINESHBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

CHETAKKUMAR KANUBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

LOKENDRA KUMAR SINGH,SURAT vs. DCIT CC-2(1)(1), SURAT

SAKAMBHARI PROCESSORS PRIVATE LIMITED,PALSANA, SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), SURAT

LOKENDRA KUMAR SINGH,SURAT vs. DCIT CC-2(1)(1), SURAT

KISHOR RAMESHBHAI MEHTA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), BHARUCH