BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi137Chandigarh72Mumbai44Kolkata44Bangalore31Chennai28Indore23Jaipur23Raipur18Ahmedabad17Pune14Hyderabad9Visakhapatnam9Cuttack7Nagpur6Lucknow6Guwahati5Amritsar5Surat4Rajkot3Cochin3Patna2SC2Jodhpur1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 2638Section 143(3)4Section 683Section 402Section 43B2Section 36(1)(va)2Disallowance2Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar2

HARMONY YARNS PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 348/SRT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.348/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Harmony Yarns Private Vs. The Pcit-1, Limited, Surat Plot-65, 1St Floor Subhash Nagar Society, Ghod Dod Road, Nr. Ram Chowk, Surat – 395001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaach5895F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Airiju Jaikaran, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 12/10/2023 23/11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 68

condonation of delay for the same. Further even if we take the amendment on Section 36(1)(va) in regards

KISHOR RAMESHBHAI MEHTA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), BHARUCH

Deduction2

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 60/SRT/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat10 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.60/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: 2013-14 (Hybrid Hearing) Kishor Rameshbhai Mehta Vs. Ito, Prop. Of Aditya Infrastructure, Ward - 1(5), 139, Maher Nagar, Opp. Baps Bharuch Hospital, Adajan Gam Circle, Surat - 395 009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Adepm 4458 R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri P. M. Jagasheth, Ca Respondent By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 10/11/2025

Section 194ASection 194CSection 2(24)Section 250Section 253(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40Section 68Section 69A

36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 9. On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in making addition of Rs.96,441/- disallowance of expenses on ad hoc basis. 10. On the facts

PURPLE MEDICAL SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD [SUCCESSOR OF MIV THERAPEUTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD],MULUND vs. PR. CIT-1, SURAT

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 186/SRT/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat02 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Purple Medical Solutions Private Limited Pr.C.I.T. (Successor Of Miv Therapeutics (India) Surat-1, Vs. Pvt. Ltd.) Surat. 615/616 Avior, Nirmal Galaxy, Lbs Road, Mulund (W), Mumbai-400080. Pan: Aaecp 3664 L Appellant Respondednt

Section 254(1)Section 263Section 36Section 43B

36 (1)(va) of the Act ignoring the fact that the total contribution is covered under the provisions of Section 43B of the Act and therefore allowable as deduction.” 2. At the outset of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative (ld. AR) of the assessee submits that pursuant to the order of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Ahmadabad Bench, dated 10/02/2020

AKLAVYA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(1)(1), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

ITA 93/SRT/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 May 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.93/Srt/2023 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2020-21) (Physical Hearing) Aklavya Industries Private Limited, Vs. The Ito, Ward1(1)(1), Plot No.2429, Road No. 24, Surat. Opp: Parle Bottling Plant, Gidc, Sachin, Surat - 394230 (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aagcs6274F

Section 143(1)Section 14BSection 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 14B of the EPF Act. Therefore, for any delay in payment of any contributions or administrative charges due for any period during the lockdown, no proceeding should be initiated for levy of penal damages in such cases.” The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 10/01/2022 (Copy enclosed at page no. 57 of PB) had stated – “In March