Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 244clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 270A5 Section 684 Section 1483 Cash Deposit3 Addition to Income3 Section 2502 Section 1442 Section 1472 Section 69A

BAKER ABDULAZIZ NORAT,PANOLI, BHARUCH, GUJARAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD 1(1), BHARUCH, BHARUCH, GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1232/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1232/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Hybrid Hearing) Baker Abdulaziz Norat, Vs. Ito, 107, Panoli Travels, Station Road, Ward – 1(1), Panoli, Bharuch – 394115 Bharuch "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Akepn7411Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Ms Vidhi Pandya, Ca Respondent By Shri Abhishek Gautam, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 24/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2025

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 270ASection 68

244/-. 4. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee filed this appeal before the CIT(A). On perusal of Form 35, the CIT(A) observed that penalty order was passed u/s 270A of the Act on 22.09.2021 and appeal should have been filed within 30 days, i.e., 22.10.2021. The appellant filed appeal on 18.01.2023, i.e., after a delay

BAKER ABDULAZIZ NORAT,PANOLI, BHARUCH, GUJARAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD 1(1), BHARUCH, BHARUCH, GUJARAT

BAKER ABDULAZIZ NORAT,PANOLI, BHARUCH, GUJARAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD 1(1), BHARUCH, BHARUCH, GUJARAT

NILESHKUMAR CHHAGANBHAI VASOYA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2)(8), SURAT

MANJUBEN NATVARBHAI PATEL L/H OF NATVARBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATEL,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, BARDOLI, BARDOLI