NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

1. The order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) (NFAC) (hereinafter referred to as NFAC) is against law and facts of the case. 2. The learned NFAC erred in holding that the appellant has not filed application for condonation of delay for filing form 10B whereby it has been held by various judicial pronouncements that audit report

NAVBHARAT CHERITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHARUCH

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi Jhagadia, Bharuch, Ward-1, Vs. Gujarat, Pin-393115 Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

1. The order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) (NFAC) (hereinafter referred to as NFAC) is against law and facts of the case. 2. The learned NFAC erred in holding that the appellant has not filed application for condonation of delay. But, as stated in statement of facts the learned Chartered Accountant has not filed Form

JAYSHRI GOPALLAL MAHARAJSHRINI SURAT SRUSTI TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

delay was to be condoned. 7.2 In the case of Social Security Scheme of GICEA v. CIT (Exemptions) [2023] 147 taxmann.com 283 (Guj.), the Assessee a Public Charitable Trust had been filing returns of income in time along with audit report under section 12A(1

NA vs. ARI MALESAR BEHDIN ANJUMAN,NAVSARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon'Ble & Shri O.P.Meena, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.272/Srt/2018 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Navsari Malesar Behdin Anjuman, V The Income Tax Officer, Agiary Street, Malesar, Navsari S Exemption Ward, Surat. Taluka, Navsari – 396 445. . [Pan: Aaatn 6124 C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri H.R.Vepari – Ca राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri O.P.Vaishav – Cit - Dr

condonation of delay is not available under the section. In order to provide relief to such Trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, it is proposed to amend section 12A of the Act to provide that in a case where a Trust or Institution has been granted registration U/s 12AA of the Act, Navsari Malesar Behdin Anjuman Vs. ITO, Exemption

S M K R VASHI HIGH SCHOOL,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.515/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2021-22) (Physical Court Hearing) S.M.K.R Vashi High School Income Tax Officer-Exemption Ward, Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, Umbhrat Road Maroli Bazar, Vs. Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Jalalpore Navsari-396436 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aalfs 0980 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

delay in filing the Form No.10B should be condoned, especially when the assessee filed the Form No.10B during the assessment proceedings, for this reliance can be placed on the judgment of Coordinate Bench of ITAT, Puna in the case of Kokan Kala Shikshan Vikaas Sanstha, in ITA No. 645/PUN/2021, order dated 30/12/2022, wherein it was held as follows

SHREE BILIMORA VIBHAG ANAVIL MANDAL NUTAN PARK, SHANTI NIKETAN SOCIETY MORORJI DESAI MARG BILIMORA NA vs. ARI,NAVSARIVS.CIT(EXEMPTION), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

12A cannot be applicable then the alternative recourse of section 57(iii) should be allowed to the assesse trust. We note that the Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the ~ 6 ~ ITA 10&11/SRT/2025 Shree Bilimora Vibhag Anavil Mandal appeal of the assesse on grounds of delay that the assesse has acknowledged the order receipt on the very same

SHREE BILIMORA VIBHAG ANAVIL MANDAL NUTAN PARK, SHANTI NIKETAN SOCIETY, MORARJI DESAI MARG BILIMORA NA vs. ARI,NAVSARIVS.CIT(EXEMPTION), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

12A cannot be applicable then the alternative recourse of section 57(iii) should be allowed to the assesse trust. We note that the Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the ~ 6 ~ ITA 10&11/SRT/2025 Shree Bilimora Vibhag Anavil Mandal appeal of the assesse on grounds of delay that the assesse has acknowledged the order receipt on the very same

AADIVASI SAMPSABHA CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION) , AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee/applicant trust are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

1. The appellant request for condonation of delay in filling appeal. The appellate order under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) passed

AADIVASI SAMPSABHA CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee/applicant trust are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

1. The appellant request for condonation of delay in filling appeal. The appellate order under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) passed

SHREE SUIGAM KHODADHOR PANJARA POLE,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

delay was to be condoned. 7.2 In the case of Social Security Scheme of GICEA v. CIT (Exemptions) [2023] 147 taxmann.com 283 (Guj.), the Assessee a Public Charitable Trust had been filing returns of income in time along with audit report under section 12A(1

GANESHMAL CHORARIA FOUNDATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 253(3) of the Act. The assessee has filed affidavits giving similar reasons for delays in filing both ITA Nos.196 to 199/SRT/2025 Ganeshmal Choraria Foundation & Charitable Trust appeals before this Tribunal. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the CIT(E) rejected the application in Form No.10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act by passing

GANESHMAL CHORARIA FOUNDATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 253(3) of the Act. The assessee has filed affidavits giving similar reasons for delays in filing both ITA Nos.196 to 199/SRT/2025 Ganeshmal Choraria Foundation & Charitable Trust appeals before this Tribunal. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the CIT(E) rejected the application in Form No.10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act by passing

GANESHMAL CHORARIA FOUNDATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 253(3) of the Act. The assessee has filed affidavits giving similar reasons for delays in filing both ITA Nos.196 to 199/SRT/2025 Ganeshmal Choraria Foundation & Charitable Trust appeals before this Tribunal. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the CIT(E) rejected the application in Form No.10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act by passing

KATARGAM INDUSTRIAL ESTATE SHEDHOLDERS,SURAT vs. CIT(E), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical\npurposes

Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and cancelling provisional registration. The CIT(E) had issued notices, but the assessees failed to provide required details and documents, leading to ex-parte orders. The appeals were filed with a delay, attributed to communication issues with the consultant.", "held": "The Tribunal condoned

GOODWILL FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.427 & 426/Srt/2025 (Assessment Years: 2024-25) (Hybrid Hearing) Goodwill Foundation Charitable Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Trust, Ahmedabad A 102, Sky Heaven Ved Gurukul Road Ved, Surat - 395004 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadtg9648P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Harikrishna Gohil, Ar Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 09/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 11/06/2025

condone the delay and admit both appeals for hearing. 6. The facts of the case in brief are that the assessee filed an application for approval under sub-clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A

GOODWILL FOUNATION CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.427 & 426/Srt/2025 (Assessment Years: 2024-25) (Hybrid Hearing) Goodwill Foundation Charitable Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Trust, Ahmedabad A 102, Sky Heaven Ved Gurukul Road Ved, Surat - 395004 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadtg9648P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Harikrishna Gohil, Ar Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 09/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 11/06/2025

condone the delay and admit both appeals for hearing. 6. The facts of the case in brief are that the assessee filed an application for approval under sub-clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A

ROTARY SHAISHNIK TABIBI SEVA SAHAYAK MANDAL,VALSAD vs. CIT(EXMEPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 396/Srt/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (Na) (Hybrid Hearing) Rotary Shaishnik Tabibi Seav Vs. Cit(Exemption) Sahayak Mandal Room No. 609, Floor No. 6, Ayakar Vai – Bhilad, At Post Sarigam Bhavan (Vejalpur), Prahalad Nagar, Road, Ahmedabad - 380015 Valsad – 396170 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aahts6053N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Suresh K. Kabra, Ca Respondent By : Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, Ld.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 04/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 18/08/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm:

condoned the delay in filing the appeal by 562 days, and the appeal heard on merit. 9. We hold that the orders dated 18.09.2023 passed by the CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad, rejecting the assessee’s applications under section 12A(1

GANESHMAL CHORARIA FOUNDATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

Appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed

sections": ["12AB", "80G(5)", "12A(1)(ac)(iii)", "253(3)"], "issues": "Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application for registration without providing adequate opportunity of hearing and proper service of notices, and whether the delay in filing appeals is liable to the Tribunal should be condoned