SHREE BILIMORA VIBHAG ANAVIL MANDAL NUTAN PARK, SHANTI NIKETAN SOCIETY, MORARJI DESAI MARG BILIMORA NA vs. ARI,NAVSARIVS.CIT(EXEMPTION), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the significant delay in filing the appeal, prioritizing substantial justice over technicalities. It set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter for adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust, filed an appeal against an order that disallowed expenditures and added corpus donations to its income. The appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) due to a delay of over 7 years in filing.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned, and if so, whether the disallowances and additions made by the CPC should be deleted on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- CIT v. K.S.P. Shanmugavel Nadai and Ors.171 citing153 ITR 596 · 1985 · HC
- Vareli Textile Industry v. CIT29 citing154 Taxmann 33
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH
PER Dr.DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JM: Captioned appeal filed by the same assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15&2015-16, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income tax dated 19.11.2024 same for both the appeal, which ITA 10&11/SRT/2025 Shree Bilimora Vibhag Anavil Mandal in turn arises out of an Assessment order dated 28.02.2016 & 27.03.2017 passed by Assessing Officer under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Grounds of appeal:
for ITA -10/SRT/2025. 1. Learned CIT(A)/NFAC erred in rejecting the delay con
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 57(iii)
- Raghuraj Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs DCIT-ACIT Cirle Silchar/DCIT Circle 1…ITA 143/GTY/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
- Nagini Cooperative Credit Society Limited… vs ITO, Ward 6(2)(1), Bangalore, BengaluruITA 619/BANG/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3412/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3411/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3410/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026