SHREE BILIMORA VIBHAG ANAVIL MANDAL NUTAN PARK, SHANTI NIKETAN SOCIETY, MORARJI DESAI MARG BILIMORA NA vs. ARI,NAVSARIVS.CIT(EXEMPTION), SURAT

ITA 10/SRT/2025Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 January 2026AY 2014-15Bench: DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA (Judicial Member), SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH (Accountant Member)11 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the significant delay in filing the appeal, prioritizing substantial justice over technicalities. It set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter for adjudication on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a trust, filed an appeal against an order that disallowed expenditures and added corpus donations to its income. The appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) due to a delay of over 7 years in filing.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned, and if so, whether the disallowances and additions made by the CPC should be deleted on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(1),Section 57(iii),Section 11,Section 12

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT

Before: DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH

For Appellant: Shri Sujesh C. Suratwala, CA
For Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR
Hearing: 18/12/2025Pronounced: 29/01/2026

PER Dr.DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JM: Captioned appeal filed by the same assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15&2015-16, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income tax dated 19.11.2024 same for both the appeal, which ITA 10&11/SRT/2025 Shree Bilimora Vibhag Anavil Mandal in turn arises out of an Assessment order dated 28.02.2016 & 27.03.2017 passed by Assessing Officer under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Grounds of appeal:

for ITA -10/SRT/2025. 1. Learned CIT(A)/NFAC erred in rejecting the delay con

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 57(iii)

All 716 judgments and leading authorities on Section 57(iii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →