NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

12A and recognition certificate under Section 80G of the Act. For the A.Y. 2017-18, the assessee filed its return of income on 17/10/2017 declaring income of Rs. 2,41,990/- . In the computation of income, the assessee claimed exemption under Section 11/12 of the Act of Rs. 24,69,286/-. The return of income was processed by Central Processing

NAVBHARAT CHERITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHARUCH

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi Jhagadia, Bharuch, Ward-1, Vs. Gujarat, Pin-393115 Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

12A as well as recognition under Section 80G(5) of the Act. Further, such exemption certificate are existing. The only reason for disallowance of claim of exemption under Section 11 ITA 27/Srt/2023 Navbharat Charitable Trust Vs ITO and 12 of the Act of Rs. 24,69,286/- was for want of Form 10B which was not filed alongwith return

NA vs. ARI MALESAR BEHDIN ANJUMAN,NAVSARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon'Ble & Shri O.P.Meena, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.272/Srt/2018 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Navsari Malesar Behdin Anjuman, V The Income Tax Officer, Agiary Street, Malesar, Navsari S Exemption Ward, Surat. Taluka, Navsari – 396 445. . [Pan: Aaatn 6124 C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri H.R.Vepari – Ca राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri O.P.Vaishav – Cit - Dr

condonation of delay is not available under the section. In order to provide relief to such Trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, it is proposed to amend section 12A

SHREE BILIMORA VIBHAG ANAVIL MANDAL NUTAN PARK, SHANTI NIKETAN SOCIETY MORORJI DESAI MARG BILIMORA NA vs. ARI,NAVSARIVS.CIT(EXEMPTION), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

12A cannot be applicable then the alternative recourse of section 57(iii) should be allowed to the assesse trust. We note that the Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the ~ 6 ~ ITA 10&11/SRT/2025 Shree Bilimora Vibhag Anavil Mandal appeal of the assesse on grounds of delay that the assesse has acknowledged the order receipt on the very same

SHREE BILIMORA VIBHAG ANAVIL MANDAL NUTAN PARK, SHANTI NIKETAN SOCIETY, MORARJI DESAI MARG BILIMORA NA vs. ARI,NAVSARIVS.CIT(EXEMPTION), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

12A cannot be applicable then the alternative recourse of section 57(iii) should be allowed to the assesse trust. We note that the Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the ~ 6 ~ ITA 10&11/SRT/2025 Shree Bilimora Vibhag Anavil Mandal appeal of the assesse on grounds of delay that the assesse has acknowledged the order receipt on the very same

JAYSHRI GOPALLAL MAHARAJSHRINI SURAT SRUSTI TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

condone delay in filing Form 10B. 8. In the case of Sarvodaya Charitable Trust vs. Income Tax Officer. (Exemption) [2021] 125 taxmann.com 75 (Gujarat)/[2021] 278 Taxman 148 (Gujarat)[09-12-2020], the High Court held that where assessee, a public charitable trust registered under section 12A

AADIVASI SAMPSABHA CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee/applicant trust are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

condonation of delay in filling appeal. The appellate order under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) passed by CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad

AADIVASI SAMPSABHA CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION) , AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee/applicant trust are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

condonation of delay in filling appeal. The appellate order under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) passed by CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad

S M K R VASHI HIGH SCHOOL,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.515/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2021-22) (Physical Court Hearing) S.M.K.R Vashi High School Income Tax Officer-Exemption Ward, Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, Umbhrat Road Maroli Bazar, Vs. Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Jalalpore Navsari-396436 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aalfs 0980 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

delay in filing the Form No.10B should be condoned, especially when the assessee filed the Form No.10B during the assessment proceedings, for this reliance can be placed on the judgment of Coordinate Bench of ITAT, Puna in the case of Kokan Kala Shikshan Vikaas Sanstha, in ITA No. 645/PUN/2021, order dated 30/12/2022, wherein it was held as follows

SHRI MODH PATNI GHANCHI GNATI PUNCH TRUST,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(6), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.88/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2016-17) (Physical Court Hearing) Shri Modh Patni Ghanchi Gnati Income Tax Officer, Punch Trust, Vs. Ward-2(3)(6), Bahulbaug, Prichhadi Road, Surat Haripura, Surat-395003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabts 2898 D (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ" /Respondent)

section 154 of the Act, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before ld CIT(A), who has dismissed the appeal of the assessee, because the assessee did not appear before ld CIT(A). 4. Against the order of ld CIT(A), the assessee filed appeal before this Tribunal and prayer of the assessee before this Tribunal is that delay

MATRUBHUMI EDUCATION TRUST,CHIKHLI NA vs. ARIVS.ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2022-2023 Matrubhumi Education Trust, Addl/Jcit(A) Bhubaneshwar, At&Po Hukeri Via Rankuwa, Tal Odisha-751007. Chikhli, Navsari-396560. Vs. Pan No. Aaetm 4713 A Appellant Respondent : Ms. Sanjay S. Kotian, Ar Assessee By : Mr. Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr Revenue By Date Of Hearing : 07/10/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/10/2025

section 12A of the Act. However, the appellant has filed the report on the Act. However, the appellant has filed the report on the Act. However, the appellant has filed the report on 20.10.2022 which has resulted into withd which has resulted into withdrawal of the benefit of rawal of the benefit of exemption

SHREE SUIGAM KHODADHOR PANJARA POLE,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

condone delay in filing Form 10B. Shree Suigam Khodadhor Panjara Pole vs. ITO(E) Asst. Year –2019-20 - 5– 10. In the case of Sarvodaya Charitable Trust vs. Income Tax Officer. (Exemption) [2021] 125 taxmann.com 75 (Gujarat)/[2021] 278 Taxman 148 (Gujarat)[09-12-2020], the High Court held that where assessee, a public charitable trust registered under section 12A

BAI PIROJBAI MANEKJI PATEL SINGAPOREWALLA ENGLISH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS,SURAT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION),AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

12A", "Section 12AB" ], "issues": "Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) erred in rejecting the applications for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act without granting adequate opportunity of hearing and proper consideration of the submitted documents. Whether the delays in filing the appeals should be condoned

ROTARY SHAISHNIK TABIBI SEVA SAHAYAK MANDAL,VALSAD vs. CIT(EXMEPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 396/Srt/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (Na) (Hybrid Hearing) Rotary Shaishnik Tabibi Seav Vs. Cit(Exemption) Sahayak Mandal Room No. 609, Floor No. 6, Ayakar Vai – Bhilad, At Post Sarigam Bhavan (Vejalpur), Prahalad Nagar, Road, Ahmedabad - 380015 Valsad – 396170 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aahts6053N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Suresh K. Kabra, Ca Respondent By : Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, Ld.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 04/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 18/08/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm:

condoned the delay in filing the appeal by 562 days, and the appeal heard on merit. 9. We hold that the orders dated 18.09.2023 passed by the CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad, rejecting the assessee’s applications under section 12A

KATARGAM INDUSTRIAL ESTATE SHEDHOLDERS,SURAT vs. CIT(E), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical\npurposes

Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and cancelling provisional registration. The CIT(E) had issued notices, but the assessees failed to provide required details and documents, leading to ex-parte orders. The appeals were filed with a delay, attributed to communication issues with the consultant.", "held": "The Tribunal condoned

THE SORABJEE NUSSERWANJEE PARUCK PARSI POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE,SURAT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

delays in filing appeals are condoned for the reasons\ngiven in the above case (supra).\n5.\nBefore deciding the lead case, the following primary facts may be stated\nin a tabular form for ready reference and appreciation of the issues:\nParticulars Bai\nPirojbai\nManekji Patel\nSinganporewalla\nEnglish School\nfor Girls ITA\nNo.487/SRT/202\n4\nDate of 11.11 1912\nincorporati\non\nDate

SAFETY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION ,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

condoned the delay of 521 days, subject to a cost of Rs. 5000 to be deposited with the Prime Minister Relief Fund, and remanded the matter back to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. The CIT(E) was directed to provide the assessee with an opportunity of hearing, uninfluenced by the previous order.", "result": "Remanded", "sections": ["80G(5)", "17A/11AA/2C", "12A

KALIDAS KURJIBHAI BAVARIYA,BARDOLI, SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, BARDOLI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.390/Srt/2022 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Physical Hearing) Kalidas Kurjibhai Bavariya, Vs. The Ito, 5/B, Tulsi Park, Gandhi Road, Ward-2, Bardoli, Surat - 394601 Bardoli "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aynpb4062A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 29/09/2023

12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay