Search: charitable trust

SHREE KHEDUT SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

ITA 738/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

charitable trust. (vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by it to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors. Besides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of sugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract 25 for payment of price higher than

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT vs. SHREE SAYAN VIBHAG SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD, SURAT

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 901/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri Akshay M Modi, AR

Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 155Section 37(1)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

Section 155 of the Income-tax Act. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.47,65,108/ made on account of receipts under different schemes viz Kalyan Fund, Road Development Fund, Land Development Fund & Charitable Trust

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR - 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT vs. SHREE SAYAN VIBHAG SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD, SURAT

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 908/SRT/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Feb 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri Akshay M Modi, AR

Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 155Section 37(1)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

Section 155 of the Income-tax Act. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.47,65,108/ made on account of receipts under different schemes viz Kalyan Fund, Road Development Fund, Land Development Fund & Charitable Trust

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE, NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG, KAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD., NAVSARI

ITA 222/SRT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

155(19) of the Act, which reflect the legislative intention to treat Government approved cane price as allowable business expenditure. The AR submitted that these provisions, read with CBDT Circular No. 18/2021 and the subsequent modification vide Finance Act, 2023, demonstrate that the legislature recognizes that cane price fixed under cooperative governance norms is allowable and that the income

SAHAKARI KHAND UDUOG MANDAL LTD.,NA vs. ARIVS.DCIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

ITA 213/SRT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

155(19) of the Act, which reflect the legislative intention to treat Government approved cane price as allowable business expenditure. The AR submitted that these provisions, read with CBDT Circular No. 18/2021 and the subsequent modification vide Finance Act, 2023, demonstrate that the legislature recognizes that cane price fixed under cooperative governance norms is allowable and that the income

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE., NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD,, NAVASARI

ITA 224/SRT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

155(19) of the Act, which reflect the legislative intention to treat Government approved cane price as allowable business expenditure. The AR submitted that these provisions, read with CBDT Circular No. 18/2021 and the subsequent modification vide Finance Act, 2023, demonstrate that the legislature recognizes that cane price fixed under cooperative governance norms is allowable and that the income

SAHADARI KHAND UDYOG MANDAL LTD.,,NA vs. ARIVS.ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

ITA 212/SRT/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

155(19) of the Act, which reflect the legislative intention to treat Government approved cane price as allowable business expenditure. The AR submitted that these provisions, read with CBDT Circular No. 18/2021 and the subsequent modification vide Finance Act, 2023, demonstrate that the legislature recognizes that cane price fixed under cooperative governance norms is allowable and that the income

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE, NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,, NAVSARI

ITA 225/SRT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

155(19) of the Act, which reflect the legislative intention to treat Government approved cane price as allowable business expenditure. The AR submitted that these provisions, read with CBDT Circular No. 18/2021 and the subsequent modification vide Finance Act, 2023, demonstrate that the legislature recognizes that cane price fixed under cooperative governance norms is allowable and that the income

SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDAL LTD.,,GANDEVI vs. ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

ITA 211/SRT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

155(19) of the Act, which reflect the legislative intention to treat Government approved cane price as allowable business expenditure. The AR submitted that these provisions, read with CBDT Circular No. 18/2021 and the subsequent modification vide Finance Act, 2023, demonstrate that the legislature recognizes that cane price fixed under cooperative governance norms is allowable and that the income