BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 272A(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai27Mumbai10Ahmedabad9Hyderabad5Jaipur5Delhi5Chandigarh4Surat3Bangalore3Agra3Kolkata1Pune1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 272A(1)(d)7Capital Gains3Penalty3Natural Justice3Section 2502Section 273B2Addition to Income2

JAYA RINKUBHAI BANDUKWALA,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(1) SURAT, SURAT

ITA 452/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat03 Dec 2025AY 2018-19
Section 250Section 272A(1)(d)

section 272A(1)(d) of the Act on\n25.08.2023. ith consent of the parties, the appeals were heard together and a\ncommon order is passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The quantum\nappeal in ITA No.451/SRT/2025 is treated as lead case. The assessee has raised\nthe following grounds of appeal:-\n“(I) Ex-parte order:\n(1

JAYA RINKUBHAI BANDUKWALA,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(1) SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 451/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat03 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.451 & 452/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Hybrid Hearing) Jaya Rinkubhai Bandukwala Income Tax Officer, बनाम/ 1/611,Dhatigara Street, Ward -3(3)(1), Surat-395 001 Vs. Timaliyawad, Manpura, Surat-395 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Bbfpb 1989 N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 250Section 272A(1)(d)

section 272A(1)(d) of the Act on 25.08.2023. ith consent of the parties, the appeals were heard together and a common order is passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The quantum ITA Nos.451-452/SRT/2025/AY.18-19 Jaya R Bandukwala appeal in ITA No.451/SRT/2025 is treated as lead case. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “(I) Ex-parte

PRITI BHANSALI,BHARUCH vs. ITO, WARD 1 , BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the penalty levied is deleted

ITA 1023/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Surat23 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamblepriti Bhansali, Income Tax Officer, Vs. D 1, Rajashree Nagar, Ward-1, Umalla, Bharuch. Bharuch-39310. [Pan : Agspb2559 H] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Pradeep Kumar Jain, Ar Respondent By: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 23.01.2026 O R D E R Per Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-:-

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Kumar Jain, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 148ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 273B

section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), levying a penalty of Rs.20,000/-, was confirmed. 3. The assessee is an individual and is not a regular filer of return of income, as she never had taxable income. Proceedings were initiated against her on the ground that her name appeared in the sale deed