BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

61 results for “disallowance”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,577Delhi5,779Chennai3,121Kolkata2,343Bangalore2,326Ahmedabad1,020Pune827Hyderabad602Jaipur582Cochin314Indore308Chandigarh287Karnataka267Raipur235Lucknow222Surat194Nagpur176Visakhapatnam166Rajkot143Amritsar100Cuttack83Calcutta77Guwahati69Jodhpur65SC61Telangana54Agra46Panaji46Ranchi43Patna32Dehradun31Kerala24Allahabad21Jabalpur17Varanasi15Punjab & Haryana8Orissa8Rajasthan7Himachal Pradesh5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Gauhati2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Deduction24Exemption20Section 8017Addition to Income15Section 80H14Section 10B11Section 80P11Section 4010Section 35B9Section 37(1)

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIPUR vs. M/S. HIRA CEMENT

Appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment is set aside and the

C.A. No.-004424-004424 - 2004Supreme Court02 Feb 2006
For Respondent: M/s. Hira Cement
Section 35LSection 5ASection 6

exemption granted to it should not be disallowed and the duty which was not paid for the period December, 1993 and December

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI vs. M/S. ESSAR TELEHOLDINGS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER

C.A. No.-002165-002165 - 2012Supreme Court31 Jan 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Section 10

Showing 1–20 of 61 · Page 1 of 4

9
Section 729
Penalty9
Section 143(2)
Section 14A

exempt under Section 10(23G) was considered by the A.O.   for   the   purpose   of   disallowance   U/S.14A.     Hence, 4 proportionate   interest

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-009606-009606 - 2011Supreme Court09 Sept 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

Section 14Section 14A

disallowed. If an expenditure incurred has no causal connection with the exempted income, then such an expenditure would obviously be treated

NATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(2) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION NEW DELHI

Appeal is hereby allowed to the extent

C.A. No.-004964-004964 - 2022Supreme Court29 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

Section 143(1)Section 197

disallowing exemptions wrongly claimed. Thereafter, the recovery can be made by an order of the competent officer as per Second

M/S. SARAF EXPORTS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR - III

C.A. No.-004822-004822 - 2022Supreme Court10 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 143(2)Section 75Section 80

disallowing the exemption as claimed, came to be upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). However, the Income Tax Appellate

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI vs. M/S. AUSTRALIAN FOODS INDIA PRIVATE LTD

The appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside, leaving the

C.A. No.-002826-002826 - 2006Supreme Court14 Jan 2013
Section 35L

exemption should not be disallowed. 5. Upon consideration of the explanation furnished by the assessee, the Commissioner inter-alia came

M/S APEX LABORATORIES P. LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LARGE TAX PAYER UNIT II

The appeal is dismissed without order on costs

C.A. No.-001554-001554 - 2022Supreme Court22 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 142(1)Section 37(1)

disallowed the benefit of the exemption for commission provided to doctors engaged in private practice for referring their patients to the assessee

UNISON ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIOINER, CENTRAL EXCISE, NOIDA

The appeals are dismissed

C.A. No.-006788-006789 - 2005Supreme Court13 Feb 2009

Bench: Dispatch From Their Factory & Stickers Bearing Uts/Tsn Were Being Affixed & These Sticker Bear The Words “Checked Sl. No. Do Not Remove This Sticker” & That The 2

Section 5A

disallowed the benefit of small scale exemption notification. It was submitted that the words UTS and TSN are not brand

M/S MERIDIAN INDUSTRIES LTD. vs. COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE

C.A. No.-004112-004112 - 2007Supreme Court27 Oct 2015
Section 35B

exemption under the relevant notification cannot be disallowed on the ground of use of imported wax as wax has already

P.R. PRABHAKAR vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, COIMBATORE

C.A. No.-000877-000877 - 2006Supreme Court18 Jul 2006
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore
Section 80H

Exemption claimed under the aforementioned provision was disallowed by the Assessing Officer on the premise that they having incurred loss

ASST. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS vs. THANTHI TRUST

C.A. No.-004406-004410 - 1996Supreme Court31 Jan 2001
For Respondent: THANTHI TRUST ETC. ETC
Section 11Section 148Section 2(15)Section 4(3)(i)

disallow the claim of the Trust for exemption under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 for the Assessment

RAJASTHAN STATE WAREHOUSING CORPN. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed with costs

C.A. No.-004049-004049 - 1994Supreme Court23 Feb 2000
For Appellant: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the caseFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Section 10(29)Section 256(1)Section 37Section 37(1)

disallowed the rest of it which was referable to the non-taxable income, being exempt under Section 10(29) of the Act. On appeal

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA vs. G.C. JAIN

Appeals are dismissed but without any

C.A. No.-006334-006335 - 2003Supreme Court04 Jul 2011

exemption, it is for the department to find out the correct legal position and to allow or disallow the same

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs. M/S.GUJRAT NARMADA V.FERTILIZERS COL.LTD

C.A. No.-001308-001308 - 2008Supreme Court17 Aug 2009

disallowed due to interpretation of Rule 6 of the 2002 Rules by 2 the Commissioner who took the view that since fertilizers were exempted

COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS vs. BRAKES INDIA LTD., MADRAS

Accordingly fails and is dismissed

C.A. No.-001287-001287 - 1982Supreme Court06 Apr 1993
For Respondent: BRAKES INDIA LTD
Section 10Section 10(6)(vii)Section 40

disallowed the balance of Rs. 15,376 in view of Section 40(c)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On an appeal by the assessee, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that since the salary of the foreign technical director was exempt

M/S JINDAL EQUIPMENT LEASING CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms

C.A. No.-000152-000152 - 2026Supreme Court09 Jan 2026

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

Section 143(3)Section 28Section 47

exemption from tax, of a sum which had been allowed as a trading liability, on accrual basis, in the hands of the transferee company which had ceased to exist. The Revenue disallowed

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V, DELHI

C.A. No.-005105-005105 - 2009Supreme Court11 Sept 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Section 12Section 12ASection 12BSection 13Section 13(1)Section 24Section 9

disallowed the same as a deduction. What weighed with the AO was also the fact that the grants received from the Central Government were in the nature of a capital receipt exempt

RAMNATH AND CO. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-002506-002509 - 2020Supreme Court05 Jun 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

Section 80

disallowance for the non-qualifying services, after taking into consideration the totality of agreement, so that the balance of the royalty/fees, etc., which was for the services covered by Section 80-O, could be exempted

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 2 vs. M/S MAHAGUN REALTORS (P) LTD

The appeal is allowed, in the above terms, without order on costs

C.A. No.-002716-002716 - 2022Supreme Court05 Apr 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 276C

exemption from tax, of a sum which had been allowed as a trading liability- on accrual basis, in the hands of the transferee 11 1963 Supp (1) SCR 699 12 1964 (6) SCR 590 12 company which had ceased to exist. The revenue disallowed

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS vs. M/S. ADISON & CO. LTD

C.A. No.-007906-007906 - 2002Supreme Court29 Aug 2016

Bench: Us Because Of An Order Dated 16.07.2008, By Which There Was A Reference To A Larger Bench In View Of The Importance Of The Questions Involved. 2. Civil Appeal No. 7906 Of 2002 Arises From The Judgment Dated 23.11.2000 Passed By The Madras High Court In R.C. No. 01 Of 1999. Civil Appeal No. 14689 Of 2015 Was Filed By The Revenue Against The Judgment Dated 26.11.2014 In Central Excise Appeal No. 21 Of 2009. Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 18426 Of 2015, 18423 Of 2015, 18425 Of 2015, 23722 Of 2015, 12282 Of 2016, 16142 Of 2016 & 16141 Of 2016 Are Filed Against The Judgment Of The Andhra Pradesh High Court In Central Excise Appeal Nos. 21 Of 2005, 9 Of 2005, 51 Of 2004, 10 Of 2005, 44 Of 2004, 38 Of 2004 & 18 Of 2005 Respectively. 3. Civil Appeal No. 8488 Of 2009 Is Filed Against The Judgment Dated 20.08.2008 Passed By The Bombay High 2

Section 11Section 4

disallowed only because they are not payable at the time of each invoice or deducted from the invoice price. He also placed reliance on IFB Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala reported in (2012) 4 SCC 618 to support his submission that to qualify for exemption