Search: depreciation

9 results for “depreciation”+ Section 350clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 115J10 Section 804 Section 80V3 Section 36(1)(va)3 Depreciation3 Deduction3 Section 3552 Section 3502 Section 332 Section 32

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MAHENDRA MILLS

The appeal is dismissed

C.A. No.-005394-005394 - 1994Supreme Court15 Mar 2000

For Respondent: MAHENDRA MILLS

Section 32Section 34Section 72Section 73

Section 16 which deals with deduction from salary. The language here is "the income chargeable under the head "salary" shall be computed after making the following deductions namely: -". Mr. Dastur like Mr. Verma also referred to judgments of the High Courts giving diverse views. High Courts of Allahabad and Madras supported the view canvassed by the Revenue while the High

M/S. DYNAMIC ORTHOPEDICS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

C.A. No.-008419-008419 - 2003

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MAHENDRA MILLS

M/S. DYNAMIC ORTHOPEDICS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MAHENDRA MILLS

M/S. DYNAMIC ORTHOPEDICS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

MALAYALA MANORAMA CO LTD. vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM

COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS (GENERAL), N. DELHI vs. GUJARAT PERSTORP ELECTRONICS LTD

CHECKMATE SERVICES P LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,SIMLA vs. M/S GREEN WORLD CORPORATION

SHIV RAJ GUPTA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI IV

COMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TRICHY vs. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD