BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

80 results for “depreciation”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,416Delhi3,763Chennai1,754Bangalore1,597Kolkata973Ahmedabad518Hyderabad303Jaipur301Karnataka262Pune256Chandigarh146Raipur144Cochin142Indore118Visakhapatnam82SC80Lucknow74Telangana62Surat61Amritsar59Rajkot54Nagpur45Ranchi45Jodhpur36Guwahati33Kerala32Calcutta29Cuttack27Patna25Panaji15Dehradun12Punjab & Haryana12Agra9Allahabad9Varanasi6Rajasthan6Jabalpur5Orissa3Gauhati2D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Tripura1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 8058Deduction43Depreciation35Addition to Income21Section 115J19Section 3217Section 41(2)15Section 80H14Section 14812Section 260A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MAHENDRA MILLS

The appeal is dismissed

C.A. No.-005394-005394 - 1994Supreme Court15 Mar 2000
For Respondent: MAHENDRA MILLS
Section 32Section 34Section 72Section 73

deduction of depreciation. It states that deduction in respect of depreciation "shall be allowed only if the prescribed particulars have

PLASTIBLENDS INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR vs. ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 8(2) MUMBAI

C.A. No.-000238-000238 - 2012Supreme Court09 Oct 2017

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Showing 1–20 of 80 · Page 1 of 4

11
Section 10B11
Exemption8
Bench:
Section 143(1)(a)Section 32Section 80

deductions in respect of depreciation. The issue is as to whether claim for deduction on account of depreciation under Section

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,DIBRUGARH vs. DOOM DOOMA INDIA LTD

C.A. No.-001094-001094 - 2009Supreme Court18 Feb 2009
Section 260ASection 28Section 32Section 32(1)(i)Section 32(1)(ii)Section 43(6)(b)

depreciation deducted in arriving at the taxable income or the depreciation deducted in arriving at the world income (composite income

M/S. VIJAY INDUSTRIES vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-001581-001582 - 2005Supreme Court01 Mar 2019

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Section 80H

deduction at the rate of 20% is to be computed after taking into account depreciation, unabsorbed depreciation and investment allowance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(CENTRAL) vs. M/S. GWALIOR RAYON SILK MFG.(WVG.)CO.LTD

The appeal is partly allowed

C.A. No.-002916-002916 - 1980Supreme Court29 Apr 1992
For Respondent: GWALIOR RAYON SILK MANUFACTURING CO. LTD
Section 256(1)Section 256(2)Section 32

depreciation. Statutory Interpretation : Taxing statutes-Provision for deduction, exemption or relief-to be construed reasonable and in favour of assessee

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYD. vs. M/S. P.J. CHEMICALS LTD

In the result, we affirm the judgments of the High Courts which have

C.A. No.-002474-002474 - 1991Supreme Court14 Sept 1994
For Respondent: P.J. CHEMICALS LTD. ETC
Section 256Section 43(1)

deducted in computing the actual cost and the depreciation will have to be calculated on the cost without deducting therefrom

M/S. DYNAMIC ORTHOPEDICS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

C.A. No.-008419-008419 - 2003Supreme Court16 Feb 2010
Section 115JSection 205Section 349Section 350Section 355Section 80V

deducted:-- [a] to [j] xxxx xxxx [k] depreciation to the extent specified in section 350. ...5/- - 5 - Ascertainment of depreciation

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III, BANGALORE vs. M/S WIPRO LIMITED

C.A. No.-001449-001449 - 2022Supreme Court11 Jul 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 10BSection 139(1)Section 72

depreciation in its P&L account. Therefore, the High Court 5 held that the intention of the assessee was to withdraw the claim for deduction

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS vs. M/S. LUCAS T.V.S. LTD. PADI CHENNAI

The appeals are allowed to the aforesaid extent

C.A. No.-005950-005952 - 2007Supreme Court14 Dec 2007
For Respondent: M/s Lucas T.V.S. Ltd. Padi Chennai
Section 32ASection 33Section 43A(1)

deduction (whether by way of depreciation or otherwise) in computing the income chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VI vs. VIRTUAL SOFT SYSTEMS LTD

The appeal is hereby dismissed leaving parties to bear their own cost

C.A. No.-004358-004358 - 2018Supreme Court24 Apr 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

deduction debited to Profit and Loss Account (P&L) in addition to the depreciation claimed in books so as to make

M/S MANGALORE GANESH BEEDI WORKS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MYSORE

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms

C.A. No.-010547-010548 - 2011Supreme Court15 Oct 2015
Section 35ASection 37

deduction of Rs. 12,24,700/- as a revenue expenditure permissible under Section 37 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the ‘Act’) towards legal expenses incurred. The Assessee also claimed depreciation

M/S KARNATAKA SMALL S.INDT.DEV.COR.LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,BANGALORE

C.A. No.-000823-000823 - 2000Supreme Court03 Dec 2002
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore
Section 115Section 115JSection 115J(1)Section 256(1)Section 28Section 32Section 72Section 73Section 74Section 74A

depreciation, unabsorbed investment allowance etc. only will be required to be carried forward to the next year? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the written down values of the assets will have to be adjusted by deducting

EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD., CALCUTTA vs. COMNR. OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTA

Appeal is allowed accordingly

C.A. No.-004167-004167 - 1994Supreme Court08 Nov 1996
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTA
Section 256(2)Section 263Section 33

deduction for depreciation which included extra shift allowance on plant and machinery and also extra depreciation on office equipment. This

M/S. O.K. PLAY (INDIA) LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI

C.A. No.-000275-000276 - 2001Supreme Court04 Feb 2005
For Respondent: Commissioner of Central Excise-II, New Delhi
Section 11ASection 2Section 35L

deduct depreciation from the profit margin and accordingly, it was contended that the matter should be remitted to the Commissioner

MALAYALA MANORAMA CO LTD. vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM

The appeals are allowed and the

C.A. No.-005420-005423 - 2002Supreme Court10 Apr 2008
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax,Trivandrum
Section 115JSection 33Section 80Section 80V

deduction under Section 80-HHC or Section 80-HHD; so, however, that such amounts are computed in the manner specified in sub-section (3) or sub-section (3-A) of Section 80-HHC or sub-section (3) of Section 80-HHD, as the case may be; or (iv) the amount of the loss or the amount of depreciation

ASSTT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX I NEW DELHI vs. M/S E FUNDS IT SOLUTION INC

C.A. No.-006082-006082 - 2015Supreme Court24 Oct 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

depreciation, investment losses, deductible expenses, carry- forward and set-off losses, etc. However, deviations are made by DTAA in cases

CHECKMATE SERVICES P LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I

C.A. No.-002833-002833 - 2016Supreme Court12 Oct 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

deductions, such as Sections 32- 37, on the other hand, deal primarily with business, commercial or professional expenditure, under various heads (including depreciation

M/S.VIRTUAL SOFT SYSTEMS LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-I

C.A. No.-007115-007115 - 2005Supreme Court06 Feb 2007
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I
Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68

depreciation allowable was Rs. 80,18,011.00 (Rs. 1,47,97,995.00 \026 Rs. 67,79,982.00 = Rs. 80,18,011.00) (viii) Making a deduction

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 11 (1) BANGALORE vs. M/S ACE MULTI AXES SYSTEMS LTD

Appeals are disposed of in the same terms

C.A. No.-020854-020854 - 2017Supreme Court05 Dec 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

Section 263Section 33BSection 80

deduction on account of depreciation in respect of such machinery or plant has been allowed or is allowable under the provisions

COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS(PREV.), GUJARAT vs. M/S. RELIANCE PETROLEUM LTD

C.A. No.-001831-001831 - 2006Supreme Court16 May 2008
Section 25

deductions on account of depreciation for arriving at the fair value for all the disputed items, which he has considered