BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 249(4)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai118Chennai94Chandigarh94Bangalore79Kolkata79Ahmedabad75Delhi61Raipur55Hyderabad44Jaipur40Pune39Surat31Lucknow30Indore21Panaji20Patna15Visakhapatnam12Jabalpur9Amritsar9Guwahati9Nagpur9Rajkot7Agra4Cuttack4Allahabad3Jodhpur3Ranchi2Varanasi2SC2Dehradun2Cochin1

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS vs. STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, ETC

- 0Supreme Court24 Feb 1989
For Respondent: STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, ETC

B, Rules 1 to 7 of Order XX-A of the Rules relating to appeals under Section 51 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 shall with necessary modifications and adaptations, apply to appeals under that Order. Rule 3 of Order XX-A provides as under: "After the appeal is registered, it shall be put up for hearing

MOTILAL CHHADAMI LAL JAIN vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , DELHI ETC

In the result of C.A. 1427/-8/75 are allowed and the

- 0Supreme Court08 Apr 1991
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , DELHI ETC
Section 4Section 4(3)(i)

condonation 240 of delay and proceed to dispose of all the four appeals by this common judgment. The assessee--appellant in all these cases is a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) known as M/s Moti Lal Chhadami Lal Jain carrying on business at Ferozabad. The HUF consisted of the karta, Chhadamilal Jain, and his son Bimal Kumar Jain. Appeal No.1426