BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 249(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai216Chennai138Kolkata128Chandigarh116Bangalore102Delhi102Ahmedabad101Raipur71Hyderabad70Jaipur67Pune55Surat54Indore53Visakhapatnam36Lucknow35Panaji28Agra25Amritsar25Patna23Cuttack23Nagpur14Rajkot14Guwahati12Ranchi11Jodhpur11Jabalpur9Allahabad6Cochin5Dehradun3SC2Varanasi2

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS vs. STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, ETC

- 0Supreme Court24 Feb 1989
For Respondent: STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, ETC

condonation of delay in respect of the special leave peti- tions to be heard by the bench of two learned Judges will be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and as such this contention should be heard by a larger bench. We are unable to accept this submission. This Court had occasion to consider the situation in which question

MOTILAL CHHADAMI LAL JAIN vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , DELHI ETC

In the result of C.A. 1427/-8/75 are allowed and the

- 0Supreme Court08 Apr 1991
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , DELHI ETC
Section 4Section 4(3)(i)

condonation 240 of delay and proceed to dispose of all the four appeals by this common judgment. The assessee--appellant in all these cases is a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) known as M/s Moti Lal Chhadami Lal Jain carrying on business at Ferozabad. The HUF consisted of the karta, Chhadamilal Jain, and his son Bimal Kumar Jain. Appeal No.1426