BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 249(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai228Chennai140Kolkata128Chandigarh120Delhi105Bangalore104Ahmedabad100Hyderabad73Raipur71Jaipur68Surat57Pune56Indore53Visakhapatnam37Lucknow35Panaji28Agra25Amritsar25Patna23Cuttack23Nagpur14Rajkot13Guwahati12Jodhpur11Ranchi11Jabalpur9Allahabad6Cochin5Dehradun3SC2Varanasi2

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS vs. STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, ETC

- 0Supreme Court24 Feb 1989
For Respondent: STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, ETC

3 should apply with regard to enlargement or abridgement of any time appointed by the Rules for doing any act. This Court was of the view that Order VI Rule 2(14) spoke of the applications for enlarge- ment or abridgement of time. Here the words "enlargement or abridgement of time" took in applications for enlargement of time appointed

MOTILAL CHHADAMI LAL JAIN vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , DELHI ETC

In the result of C.A. 1427/-8/75 are allowed and the

- 0Supreme Court08 Apr 1991
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , DELHI ETC
Section 4Section 4(3)(i)

condonation 240 of delay and proceed to dispose of all the four appeals by this common judgment. The assessee--appellant in all these cases is a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) known as M/s Moti Lal Chhadami Lal Jain carrying on business at Ferozabad. The HUF consisted of the karta, Chhadamilal Jain, and his son Bimal Kumar Jain. Appeal No.1426