Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 130Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

M/S. CHAUDHARY SHIP BREAKERS vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,AHMEDABAD

The appeal is allowed; the impugned order is

C.A. No.-001908-001908 - 2006Supreme Court22 Oct 2010

Bench: Us, Imported An Old Vessel For Demolition Purpose Under Memorandum Of Agreement (For Short “Moa”) Dated 19Th November 1997 With Standard Marine Trading Inc., New York On “As Is Where Is” Basis. As Per The Said Moa, The Total Purchase Price Of The Vessel Was Agreed At Us $ 992887.20 At The Rate Of Us $ 172 Per Long Ton. The Light Displacement Tonnage (Ldt) Of The Vessel Was Shown At 5772.6 Ldt. As Per Clause 12(B) Of The Moa, The Buyer Was Given An Option To Seek Proportionate Reduction In 2

Section 130E

Delay condoned. 3. This civil appeal under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short “the Act”) is directed

M/S COAL INDIA LTD. vs. COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(PORT) KOLKATA

The appeal is dismissed

C.A. No.-008028-008028 - 2010Supreme Court01 May 2025

Bench: The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata (‘Cestat’ For Short Digitally Signed By Ashish Kondle Date: 2025.05.01 11:42:33 Ist Reason: Signature Not Verified

Section 130E

Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order dated 20.04.2010 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata in appeal No.CDM-164/2004. 2. Be it stated that appellant had filed appeal No.CDM-164/2004 before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata (‘CESTAT’ for short Digitally signed by ASHISH KONDLE Date