BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

223 results for “capital gains”

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,841Delhi2,998Chennai1,149Ahmedabad874Bangalore761Jaipur744Hyderabad695Kolkata673Pune547Chandigarh380Indore372Cochin283Surat277Nagpur226SC223Raipur209Visakhapatnam193Rajkot163Lucknow130Patna119Agra119Amritsar113Dehradun80Panaji77Cuttack68Ranchi63Guwahati62Jodhpur59Jabalpur51Allahabad24Varanasi11A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Deduction41Depreciation19Addition to Income19Section 80H16Section 37(1)12Section 44C11Section 10(2)11Section 5711Section 8010Exemption

RAJ PAL SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HARYANA

In the result, this appeal fails and is, therefore, dismissed

C.A. No.-002416-002416 - 2010Supreme Court25 Aug 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

Section 256(1)Section 4Section 45Section 6

capital gains”. 29.1. As noticed, capital gains are those profits or gains which arise out of the transfer of capital

M.S.P. NADAR SONS, VIRUDHU NAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), MADRAS

- 0Supreme Court28 Apr 1993
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), MADRAS

Showing 1–20 of 223 · Page 1 of 12

...
10
Capital Gains10
Section 29
For Respondent:
Section 256Section 70Section 80Section 80T

capital gains are bifurcated into long term capital gains and short term capital gains, and 446 447 relying on the decision

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI vs. HARPRASAD & CO. (P) LTD

In the result, the appeal is accepted with costs

- 0Supreme Court25 Feb 1975
For Respondent: HARPRASAD & CO. (P) LTD
Section 12B

capital gains were not taxable made huge capital gains he would not be obliged to show those capital gains in his return

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) vs. TIGER GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL II HOLDINGS

C.A. No.-000262-000262 - 2026Supreme Court15 Jan 2026

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

capital gains arising from the alienation of shares of an Indian company. In the present case, however, the capital gains

VATSALA SHENOY vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-001234-001234 - 2012Supreme Court18 Oct 2016
Section 260Section 583(4)(a)

capital gains and short term capital gains. Two components of long term capital gains are taken into consideration, namely goodwill

M/S FIBRE BOARDS (P) LTD BANGALOARE vs. CIT BANGALORE

C.A. No.-005525-005526 - 2005Supreme Court11 Aug 2015
Section 280YSection 280ZSection 54G

capital gain made by it. 2. By an order dated 31.3.1994, the Assessing Officer imposed a tax on capital gains

NAVIN JINDAL vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-000634-000634 - 2006Supreme Court11 Jan 2010
Section 48(2)

capital gains shall be applicable in respect of capital gains accruing or arising from every re- investment thereafter in, and sale

DELHI FARMING & CONSTRUCTION(P) LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

In the result, we set aside the judgment of the High Court and uphold the

C.A. No.-007525-007527 - 2001Supreme Court26 Mar 2003
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI
Section 104

capital gains falling within section 45 of the Act would be chargeable to income-tax under the head "capital gains

THE COMMONWEALTH TRUST LTD., CALICUT, KERALA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA II, ERNAKULAM

- 0Supreme Court30 Jul 1997
For Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA II, ERNAKULAM
Section 261Section 40Section 50(1)Section 55(2)Section 55(2)(i)

Capital gains. - (1) Any profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS vs. M/S. MADURAI MILLS CO. LIMITED

- 0Supreme Court09 Mar 1973
For Respondent: M/S. MADURAI MILLS CO. LIMITED
Section 12B

capital gains arising before April 1, 1948. Capital gains tax was, however, revived with effect from April 1, 1957 by the Finance

MISS DHUN DADABHOY KAPADIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

- 0Supreme Court31 Oct 1966
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY
Section 12BSection 66A(2)

capital gain was not represented by Rs. 45,262.50 was correct. The net capital gain could only be properly computed

JAMES ANDERSON, ADMINISTRATOR OFTHE ESTATE OF THELATE HENR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,BOMBAY

- 0Supreme Court04 Mar 1960
For Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,BOMBAY

capital gain under s. 12B of the Income Tax Act. For the assessment year 1947-48 the capital gain was computed

SH. SANJEEV LAL ETC. ETC. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHANDIGARH&AN

C.A. No.-005899-005900 - 2014Supreme Court01 Jul 2014
Section 45Section 54

capital gain had been used for purchase of the said new asset, believing that the long term capital gain was Page

SHRI KARTIKEYA vs. .SARABHAI. VS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

- 0Supreme Court04 Sept 1997
For Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 100(1)(c)Section 2(47)

capital gains on the reduction of preference share capital which was exigible to capital gains tax?" The high court considered

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. P.V.A.L. KULANDAGAN CHETTIAR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS

- 0Supreme Court26 May 2004
For Respondent: P.V.A.L. KULANDAGAN CHETTIAR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS

capital gains’ is a well defined concept and the taxable event is ’transfer’ or ’alienation’ of property and capital gains

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY vs. THE PROVIDENT INVESTMENT CO., LTD

In the result, the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs

- 0Supreme Court15 May 1957
For Respondent: THE PROVIDENT INVESTMENT CO., LTD

Capital gains’ in respect of any profits or gains arising from the sale, exchange or transfer of a capital asset

TEA ESTATE INDIA (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

- 0Supreme Court26 Apr 1976
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Section 2Section 2(1)Section 2(3)

capital gains. The High Court arrived at certain figures of excess profit which was included in the computation of capital

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs. D.P. SANDU BROS CHEMBUR (P) LTD

C.A. No.-002335-002335 - 2003Supreme Court31 Jan 2005
For Respondent: D.P. Sandu Bros. Chembur (P) Ltd
Section 10(3)Section 2(24)(vi)Section 45Section 48Section 55(2)Section 56

capital gains could not be computed as envisaged in Section 48 of the Income Tax Act, therefore capital gains earned

M/S JINDAL EQUIPMENT LEASING CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms

C.A. No.-000152-000152 - 2026Supreme Court09 Jan 2026

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

Section 143(3)Section 28Section 47

Capital gains “Any profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year shall

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHIVAKAMI CO. PVT. LTD

- 0Supreme Court18 Mar 1986
For Respondent: SHIVAKAMI CO. PVT. LTD
Section 12Section 12BSection 12B(1)

Capital gains was intended to tax the gains of an assessee, not what an assessee might have gained. All laws