BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 250clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,195Delhi872Chennai309Bangalore290Kolkata270Karnataka255Ahmedabad236Hyderabad179Surat174Jaipur156Cochin117Chandigarh96Indore87Pune86Rajkot55Calcutta51Visakhapatnam32Nagpur23Cuttack22Lucknow20Amritsar18Raipur17Guwahati11Telangana11SC10Patna8Varanasi8Jodhpur7Allahabad6Ranchi4Rajasthan3Dehradun2Agra1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 2635Section 143(3)4Section 1474Section 1483Section 50C2

SRI NALIN RANJAN,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO WD-1(3), JSR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 331/RAN/2017[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Aug 2019

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 50C

transfer of land & building belonging to the assessee. P a g e 1 | 7 Ass essment Year : 2014 -15 3. For that the CIT(A) erred in upholding the cost of construction at Rs.750/- per sq.ft determined arbitrarily by the AO and also by upholding the method of computing capital gain as employed by the AO notwithstanding that the question

SUDHIR KUMAR JHA,BOKARO STEEL CITY vs. ACIT OR DCIT, CIRCLE-3, BOKARO

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 131/RAN/2024[2017-2018]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ranchi
24 Apr 2025
AY 2017-2018
For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Jha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr. DR
Section 250

250 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AY 2017-18.\n2.\nShri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the revenue\nand Shri Anil Kumar Jha, Advocate appeared on behalf of the assessee.\n3. It was submitted by the Ld. AR that the assessee is an employee of\nSteel Authority India

ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY,DHANBAD vs. PR. CIT, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 11/RAN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi24 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

250/- (ii) Purchase of bricks of ₹ 9,30,150/- (iii) Stone chips of ₹ 3,20,900/- (iv) Sand of ₹ 2,94,500/- (v) Steel of ₹ 11,78,852/- (vi) Plumbing material of ₹ 1,61,090/- (vii) Marble & Tiles of ₹ 17,73,356/- (b) Payment made to land owner of ₹ 31,06,375/- (c) Source & Advance

OM PRAAKSH SINGH,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 361/RAN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Sept 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S, Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Om Prakash Singh Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Sankalp, East Jail Road, Ranchi- 834001. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Agkps0300D (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""थ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Manjit Verma, A/RFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Mohanti, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234CSection 263Section 37(1)

price Rs. 213.31 lakhs) after reducing provision for diminution in value of Rs, 182.90 lakhs and such provision for diminution in the value of investment (Rs. 182.90 lakhs) was debited to the profit/loss a/c. as the investment in shares was to be treated as capital investment and any expenditure/loss thereon was to be treated as capital expenditure/loss