M/S USHA MARTIN LTD,KOLKATA vs. ACIT CIR-3, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: BEFORES/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

section 234 B and 234D, theseare consequential in nature. Consequently, additional grounds raised by the assessee stand disposed as per the above direction. 9. Now coming to the main appeal filed the assessee, Ground No.1 is general in nature and consequently not adjudicated. 10. In Ground No.2, the same has three limbs. In Ground No.2.2, most specifically Ground No.2.2.2

ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY,DHANBAD vs. PR. CIT, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

10,42,27,450/- received in lieu of allotment of flats has been brought forward from the books of preceeding year and does not pertains to the year under consideration and further submitted that during the aforesaid assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) all the aforesaid supporting documents were produced and duly verified by the Ld. AO and detailed enquiries were

SUDHIR KUMAR JHA,BOKARO STEEL CITY vs. ACIT OR DCIT, CIRCLE-3, BOKARO

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

10 14. Payments were received in cash till Sept. 16 and registry was done on\n19.12.2016.\nMy\nmain\nsource\nof income is agricultural income, excluding\nagricultural income, does not exceed the basic exemption limit for filing income\nand total\nnet\nincome\n4.\ntax\nreturn. Copy of PAN enclosed as Annexure-2. Land ownership certicale for some larids\nin village Bardaha