Search: penalty u/s 271

9 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 139(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 27436 Section 271(1)(c)34 Section 271A25 Section 153A20 Section 132(1)9 Penalty9 Undisclosed Income8 Section 2717 Addition to Income

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and copy of common order passed is to be placed on respective case files

ITA 16/RAN/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi17 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 132(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274Section 80G

5,86,94,960/-. Subsequently the AO passed order u/s 153A/143(3) on 23.12.2016 determining the total income at Rs. 6,52,94,920/- and also initiated penalty proceedings u/s.271(1)(c) read with explanation 5A of the Act. The AO passed penalty order u/s.271(1)(c) on 30.06.2017 and levied penalty of Rs.16,74,935/- being

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

M/S NANDLAL KESHARDEO,RANCHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE (1), RANCHI

SRI SANJAY KUMAR SHARDA,WEST SINGHBHUM vs. ACIT, C.C.-1, RANCHI

M/S SHRI RAM POWER & STEEL PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. ACIY, C.C.1, RANCHI

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. SHRI KAMAL BHUSHAN, RANCHI

SHRI NIRANJAN KUMAR AGARWAL,DHANBAD vs. ITO WD-2(1), DHANBAD

GAJANAN FERRO PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR

GAJANAN FERRO PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR