BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi420Mumbai345Bangalore226Jaipur152Hyderabad141Pune62Chennai59Chandigarh51Kolkata50Rajkot48Amritsar28Ahmedabad28Visakhapatnam20Guwahati17Surat15Agra14Indore14Patna12Nagpur11Lucknow10Cochin8Jodhpur7Allahabad4Ranchi3Raipur2Panaji2Telangana2Jabalpur1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 1488Section 1477Section 10(38)4Section 143(2)4Addition to Income3Section 234A2Section 692Long Term Capital Gains2Penny Stock2

GITA KUMARI,RANCHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 21/RAN/2022[17-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Nov 2023

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 133ASection 142ASection 147Section 69

survey was conducted on the assessee i.e Dr. Hemant Narayan Ray and Comprehensive Care Unit concern u/s 133A of the Act on 6.9.2018 during which various documents relating investments were found besides the evidences of residential premises being constructed in Ashok Nagar, Ranchi. The AO referred the valuation of property to the DVO u/s 142A

SRI AJAY KUMAR MURARKA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Exemption2
Penalty2
ITA 202/RAN/2019[2011-12]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ranchi
13 Dec 2023
AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Ringasia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234A

house property, capital gain and other sources. Original return was filed on 14.09.2011, reporting a total income of Rs.19,36,530/-. Subsequently, Ld. AO recorded the reasons to believe stating that assessee has claimed long term capital gain as exempt income amounting to Rs.1,83,47,999/- which has not been substantiated during the survey proceedings u/s. 133A

SRI AJAY KUMAR MURARKA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1),, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 56/RAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi13 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Ringasia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234A

house property, capital gain and other sources. Original return was filed on 14.09.2011, reporting a total income of Rs.19,36,530/-. Subsequently, Ld. AO recorded the reasons to believe stating that assessee has claimed long term capital gain as exempt income amounting to Rs.1,83,47,999/- which has not been substantiated during the survey proceedings u/s. 133A