BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “condonation of delay”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai522Kolkata455Delhi383Mumbai281Jaipur206Ahmedabad178Hyderabad145Bangalore136Surat101Pune76Chandigarh75Visakhapatnam73Amritsar67Rajkot61Karnataka51Nagpur47Calcutta45Indore40Cuttack39Lucknow38Patna29Raipur29Cochin23Agra15Guwahati13Ranchi12Allahabad10Varanasi9Telangana8Dehradun7Panaji5SC4Jabalpur2Jodhpur2Andhra Pradesh1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)45Section 27438Section 153A16Penalty11Undisclosed Income10Section 132(1)9Section 132(4)9Capital Gains9Long Term Capital Gains

PRAVIN KUMAR,RANCHI vs. ACIT, C.C.1, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 327/RAN/2025[21-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi27 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan(Through Hybrid Mode) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.327/Ran/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2021-2022) Pravin Kumar, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, S/O-D. Thakur, Beed Banglow Ranchi Tatisilwai, Ranchi-835103 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Bhupk 7127 E (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: ShriFor Respondent: Shri Khubchand T Pandya, Sr. DR

condone the delay of 237 days in the appeal and the appeal of the assessee is admitted to be disposed off. 2 4. It was submission that there was a search carried out in the premises of the assessee on 09.02.2011 relating to the assessment year 2021-2022. The cash of Rs.3 lakhs was found which had been claimed

GAJANAN FERRO PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/RAN/2022[2013-14]Status: Disposed
9
Section 270A6
Addition to Income3
Condonation of Delay3
ITAT Ranchi
20 Feb 2025
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

undisclosed income which is sine qua non for invoking section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address

GAJANAN FERRO PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 86/RAN/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

undisclosed income which is sine qua non for invoking section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address

GAJANAN FERRO PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 84/RAN/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

undisclosed income which is sine qua non for invoking section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address

RINKU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 81/RAN/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

undisclosed income in the statement recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act and paid the due taxes while filing return in response to notice u/s 153A. The assessee admitted the allegation of the AO regarding certain manipulation in the transaction of shares to earn long term capital gains to buy peace and the return of income was also accepted

NITU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 82/RAN/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

undisclosed income in the statement recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act and paid the due taxes while filing return in response to notice u/s 153A. The assessee admitted the allegation of the AO regarding certain manipulation in the transaction of shares to earn long term capital gains to buy peace and the return of income was also accepted

SACHIN PODDAR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 87/RAN/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

undisclosed income which is sine qua non for invoking section 271(1)(c). Sachin Poddar Vs DCIT 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. We find from perusal of record that there is delay of one day in filing of this appeal of the assessee before

JITENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALCIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 88/RAN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi22 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

undisclosed income which is sine qua non for invoking section 271(1)(c). Jitendra Kr. Agarwal Vs DCIT 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. We find from perusal of record that there is delay of one day in filing of this appeal of the assessee

CRYSTAL THERMOTECH PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 79/RAN/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

undisclosed income which is sine qua non for invoking section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." Crystal Thermotech P ltd. Vs DCIT 2. We find from perusal of record that there is delay of one day in filing of this appeal

CRYSTAL THERMOTECH PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 80/RAN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

undisclosed income which is sine qua non for invoking section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." Crystal Thermotech P ltd. Vs DCIT 2. We find from perusal of record that there is delay of one day in filing of this appeal

BABY CHATTERJEE,RANCHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), RANCHI, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 241/RAN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi16 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Baby Chatterjee, I.T.O., 2A/2B, Krishna Enclave, North Office Ward 1(3), Vs. Para, Doranda, Ranchi-834002 Ranchi. (Jharkhand) Pan No. Anppc 8818 A Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 142(1)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274Section 69A

delay of about one month in filing this appeal is condoned. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee had declared income under the head 'income from salary and income from other sources (interest)' for the assessment year under consideration and declared total income at ₹ 4,16,400/- . The case was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS

M/S EKLAVYA ESTATE PVT.LTD.,RANCHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 258/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi03 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaym/S Eklavya Estate Pvt. Ltd., D.C.I.T., H-95, Harmu Housing Colony, Central Circle-2, Vs. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aabce 5815 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 133ASection 270ASection 274

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal disposed off on merits. 3. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a private limited unlisted company, engaged in the real estate business. Survey under section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) was conducted in the case of assessee