BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

23 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai607Delhi466Chennai330Kolkata304Ahmedabad253Jaipur230Bangalore200Surat158Pune148Hyderabad126Karnataka126Indore102Rajkot69Chandigarh64Lucknow55Nagpur54Cuttack45Calcutta43Cochin41Patna35Visakhapatnam34Agra26Guwahati26Raipur24Amritsar24Ranchi23Panaji17Jabalpur14SC12Allahabad10Dehradun6Jodhpur5Varanasi3Telangana2Punjab & Haryana2Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)58Section 27437Penalty23Section 153A16Limitation/Time-bar13Section 132(1)9Section 132(4)9Capital Gains9Long Term Capital Gains

GAJANAN FERRO PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 84/RAN/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

GAJANAN FERRO PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

Showing 1–20 of 23 · Page 1 of 2

9
Undisclosed Income9
Section 270A6

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/RAN/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

GAJANAN FERRO PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 86/RAN/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

NITU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 82/RAN/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

RINKU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 81/RAN/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

SACHIN PODDAR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 87/RAN/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). Sachin Poddar Vs DCIT 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. We find from perusal of record that there is delay of one day in filing of this appeal of the assessee before the Tribunal. Impugned order was passed

JITENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALCIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 88/RAN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi22 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). Jitendra Kr. Agarwal Vs DCIT 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. We find from perusal of record that there is delay of one day in filing of this appeal of the assessee before the Tribunal. Impugned order was passed

CRYSTAL THERMOTECH PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 80/RAN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." Crystal Thermotech P ltd. Vs DCIT 2. We find from perusal of record that there is delay of one day in filing of this appeal of the assessee before the Tribunal. Impugned order was passed

CRYSTAL THERMOTECH PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 79/RAN/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." Crystal Thermotech P ltd. Vs DCIT 2. We find from perusal of record that there is delay of one day in filing of this appeal of the assessee before the Tribunal. Impugned order was passed

M/S EKLAVYA ESTATE PVT.LTD.,RANCHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 258/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi03 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaym/S Eklavya Estate Pvt. Ltd., D.C.I.T., H-95, Harmu Housing Colony, Central Circle-2, Vs. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aabce 5815 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 133ASection 270ASection 274

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal disposed off on merits. 3. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a private limited unlisted company, engaged in the real estate business. Survey under section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) was conducted in the case of assessee

M/S. EKLAVYA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 239/RAN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 239/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 243/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2013-13 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This

M/S. EKLAVYA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 240/RAN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 239/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 243/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2013-13 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This

M/S. EKLAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 247/RAN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 245/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 248/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2023-14 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This

M/S. EKLAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 246/RAN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 245/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 248/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2023-14 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This

M/S. EKLAVYA ESTATE PVT. LTD.,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 243/RAN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 239/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 243/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2013-13 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This

M/S. EKLAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 245/RAN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 245/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 248/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2023-14 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This

M/S. EKLAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 249/RAN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 245/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 248/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2023-14 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This

M/S. EKLAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 248/RAN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 245/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 248/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2023-14 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This

M/S. EKLAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 250/RAN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 245/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 248/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2023-14 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This

M/S. EKLAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 251/RAN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and deal these cases as per documents on record. 4. In ITA No. 245/Ran/2024 to ITA No. 248/Ran/2024 for the A.Y. 2023-14 to 2016-17, the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee had filed application stating that they are proceeding for Direct VSV Scheme of the department and Form No. 4 has already been issued. This