MAKHAN LAL GUPTA,DHANBAD vs. ITO WARD 1(1), DHANBAD
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 367/RAN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi21 Aug 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: S/ S/Hri George Mathan & Ratnesh Nandan Sahayratnesh Nandan Sahayratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year : 2013-14 Makhan Makhan Lal Lal Gupta, Gupta, Acc Acc Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward- Income Tax Officer, Ward Limited, Limited, Sindri Sindri Cement Cement 1(10, Dhanbad 1(10, Dhanbad Work, Acc Colony, Sindri , Work, Acc Colony, Sindri , Dhanbad Pan/Gir No. No. Auzpg 5573 D Appellant Appellant .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : None (Adjn.Petition) (Adjn.Petition) Revenue Revenue By : Shri Khubchand T Pandya, Ld Sr. Khubchand T Pandya, Ld Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 21/08/202 2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 21/08/2 2025
For Appellant: None (Adjn.petition)For Respondent: Shri Khubchand T Pandya, ld Sr
Section 147Section 249(2)Section 249(3)
section did not condone the delay in filing of appeal. In our
P a g e 2 | 4
Assessment Year : 2013-14
considered opinion, such delay needs to be condoned, because according to him, the notices were sent in wrong address and he was not aware of the fact and only when he came to know about passing of orders