BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 2(47)(v)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,035Delhi725Chennai301Bangalore271Jaipur209Ahmedabad196Hyderabad160Chandigarh151Kolkata96Cochin88Raipur81Indore80Pune69Nagpur50Rajkot47Visakhapatnam37Surat31Lucknow29Guwahati29Amritsar20Patna18Cuttack16Jodhpur8Agra7Dehradun6Ranchi2Allahabad2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1488Section 1476Section 10(38)4Section 143(2)4Section 234A2Long Term Capital Gains2Penny Stock2Exemption2Penalty2Addition to Income

SRI AJAY KUMAR MURARKA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 202/RAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi13 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Ringasia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234A

47,999/- which has not been substantiated during the survey proceedings u/s. 133A and thereafter. He thus formed reasons to believe that income to this extent has escaped 4 ITA No.56/Ran/2019 & ITA No.202/Ran/2019 Ajay Kumar Murarka, AY: 2011-12 assessment. Notice u/s. 148 was issued which is dated 22.03.2017. In the course of reassessment proceedings, Ld. AO issued notice

2

SRI AJAY KUMAR MURARKA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1),, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 56/RAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi13 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Ringasia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234A

47,999/- which has not been substantiated during the survey proceedings u/s. 133A and thereafter. He thus formed reasons to believe that income to this extent has escaped 4 ITA No.56/Ran/2019 & ITA No.202/Ran/2019 Ajay Kumar Murarka, AY: 2011-12 assessment. Notice u/s. 148 was issued which is dated 22.03.2017. In the course of reassessment proceedings, Ld. AO issued notice