Search: TDS | BharatTax

7 results for “TDS”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1477 Section 2637 Section 153A7 Addition to Income5 Section 143(3)4 Section 1483 Section 683 Section 1392 Section 2502 Unexplained Cash Credit

PADAM KUMAE JAIN,RANCHI vs. CIT, CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 289/RAN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Jul 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.289/Ran/2019 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Padam Kumar Jain Vs. Cit, Central, Cr Building, Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna – 800001. Ratanlalsurajmal Compound, Main Road, Ranchi – 834001, Jharkhand "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abrpj 0001 E (Assessee) .. (Revenue)

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Chaudhury & Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Inderjeet Singh, CIT (DR)

Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

undisclosed income. The family members of the assessee have made disclosure separately. On careful consideration of above facts and circumstances, I am of the opinion that assessment order passed by the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. I, therefore, cancel the order of the AO passed

PADAM KUMAE JAIN,RANCHI vs. CIT, CENTRAL, PATNA

PADAM KUMAE JAIN,RANCHI vs. CIT, CENTRAL, PATNA

ACIT,C.C.-1, RANCHI vs. M/S KOIRA ORES PRIVATE LIMITED, GIRIDIH

RAM KUMAR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR

SHRI KIRTIMAN SINGH,RANCHI vs. DCIT, RANCHI

ACIT,CIRCLE-2(1), HAZARIBAG vs. SANJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY, HAZARIBAG

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR vs. BENKO TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

ACIT CIR-3, JAMSHEDPUR vs. M/S SOKHI ENGINEERING CO P LTD, JAMSHEDPUR