CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI

73,000\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nTotal Rs.\n2,87,64,70,000\n56,04,32,000\n2,65,77,93,000\nDisputed\n57,14,34,000\nDisputed\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land\n1\n2\nLand & Crop Compensation

DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

73,000\n12 Prior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n13 Repair expenses\n14 Stripping Activity Adjustment\n18 R & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nTotal

SHRI NAVNEET MODI,RANCHI vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.53/Ran/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shri Navneet Modi….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant Modi House, Kanke Dam Side Road, Kanke, Ranchi-834008. [Pan: Actpm1511F] Vs. Dcit, Circle-2, Ranchi.………………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 28, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 03.10.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Ranchi [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

TDS certificate to the assessee at the time of filing of Income Tax Return for the assessment year under consideration. The ld. Assessing Officer rejected all the contentions made by the assessee on single line order that the contention of the assessee was not accepted and the amount is treated as income not disclosed and levied the impugned penalty. I.T.A

ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY,DHANBAD vs. PR. CIT, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

1,61,090/- (vii) Marble & Tiles of ₹ 17,73,356/- (b) Payment made to land owner of ₹ 31,06,375/- (c) Source & Advance of ₹ 10,42,27,450/- received in lieu of allotment of flats. "That the appellant appeared before the PCIT Dhanbad and filed the details of all the aforesaid expenses with supporting documents and his explanation stating, inter

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

TDS certificates issued by the M/s BCCL,\nno justification for the claim of expenses which are mostly outstanding at the end\nof the year, could be produced by them. Attempts to collect complete details of\npayment made by the M/s BCCL to Sri Lal Babu Singh has been stone walled by\nthe officials of on one pretext or other

DCIT CIRCLE-1 , RANCHI vs. CCL LTD , RANCHI

Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business expenditure\nAllowability of (Welfare expenses of employees) - Assessee-\ncompany was engaged in business of coal mining It claimed\nexpenses incurred towards welfare of of its employees like canteen,\nhostels, etc. business expenditure Commissioner disallowed same\non ground that said expenditures had not been properly explained\nand that assessee

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

73,000\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nTotal Rs.\n2,87,64,70,000\n56,04,32,000\n2,65,77,93,000\n57,14,34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2011-12\nBy Assessee\nAY 2012-13\nBy Assessee

DCIT CIR-1,, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

73,000\n12 Prior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n13 Repair expenses\n14 Stripping Activity Adjustment\n18 R & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nTotal

CCL,RANCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1, RANCHI

73,000\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\nRepair expenses\nStripping Activity Adjustment\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nTotal Rs.\n2,87,64,70,000\n56,04,32,000\n2,65,77,93,000\n57,14,34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

TDS certificates issued by the M/s BCCL,\nno justification for the claim of expenses which are mostly outstanding at the end\nof the year, could be produced by them. Attempts to collect complete details of\npayment made by the M/s BCCL to Sri Lal Babu Singh has been stone walled by\nthe officials of on one pretext or other

M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, RANCHI

73,000\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nTotal Rs.\n2,87,64,70,000\n56,04,32,000\n2,65,77,93,000\nDisputed\n57,14,34,000\nDisputed\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land\nLand & Crop Compensation\nCredit

CCL LTD ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

73,000\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nTotal Rs.\n2,87,64,70,000\n56,04,32,000\n2,65,77,93,000\nDisputed\n57,14,34,000\nDisputed\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land\n1\n2\nLand & Crop Compensation

CCL,RNCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

73,000\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\nRepair expenses\nStripping Activity Adjustment\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nTotal

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

73,000\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\nRepair expenses\nStripping Activity Adjustment\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nTotal

CCL ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business expenditure\nAllowability of (Welfare expenses of employees) Assessee-\ncompany was engaged in business of coal mining It claimed\nexpenses incurred towards welfare of of its employees like canteen,\nhostels, etc. business expenditure Commissioner disallowed same\non ground that said expenditures had not been properly explained\nand that assessee

SRI SITA RAM RAI,DHANBAD vs. ITO, DHANBAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. Nos.13&14/Ran/2022 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 Sri Sita Ram Rai……..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant 1, New Karmik Nagar, Ism Saraidhella, Dhanbad, Jharkhand - 826004. [Pan: Afipr2324B] Vs. Ito, Tds Ward-Dhanbad………………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 01, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: Both The Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 15.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In Both The Appeals Has Agitated The Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S 234E Of The Act Along With Interest Thereupon Levied U/S 220(2) Of The Act. Since, Common Issues Are Involved In All The Appeals, Hence These Have Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. The Appeal In Ita No.13/Ran/2022 For Assessment Year 2013-14 Is Taken As Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Deducted Tax At Source (Tds) In Respect Of Certain Payments. As Per The Provisions Of 1

1 I.T.A. Nos.13&14/Ran/2022 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 Sri Sita Ram Rai section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return

SRI SITA RAM RAI,DHANBAD vs. ITO TDS WARD, DHANBAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. Nos.13&14/Ran/2022 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 Sri Sita Ram Rai……..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant 1, New Karmik Nagar, Ism Saraidhella, Dhanbad, Jharkhand - 826004. [Pan: Afipr2324B] Vs. Ito, Tds Ward-Dhanbad………………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 01, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: Both The Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 15.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In Both The Appeals Has Agitated The Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S 234E Of The Act Along With Interest Thereupon Levied U/S 220(2) Of The Act. Since, Common Issues Are Involved In All The Appeals, Hence These Have Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. The Appeal In Ita No.13/Ran/2022 For Assessment Year 2013-14 Is Taken As Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Deducted Tax At Source (Tds) In Respect Of Certain Payments. As Per The Provisions Of 1

1 I.T.A. Nos.13&14/Ran/2022 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 Sri Sita Ram Rai section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1952, a deductor must file quarterly returns/ statements of the Tax deducted at source (TDS). The assessee filed returns of the TDS belatedly. The Income Tax Authorities processed the return

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

section 132(1)\nof the Act was carried out in the case of Sri Lal Babu Singh on November 23,\n2011. In the course of search operations, cash in the form of deposits in the bank\naccounts of Rs. 75.78 crs and Fixed Deposits of Rs. 17.40 crs were found and\nseized.\nBCCL,\nPost-search investigations in this group