ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

34,242/-\nii) Balance Sheet of L B Singh and K N Singh: Rs. 2,29,65,337/-.\nTotal value: Rs. 7,75,99,579/-.\nShort fall after reconciliation due to non-availability of records in case of Bharat Singh: - Rs. 15,46,00,421\n(23,22,00,000-7,75,99,579).\nProfit & Loss a/c and Balance Sheet

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

10,803.00)\nOutstanding Liabilities\nB.O.I. CIA 0012\n3,796,623.49\nI.C.I.C.I Bank 30858\n10,817,678.00\nLiabilities for Exp.\n56,000.00\nB.O.I. C/A 0032\n13,430.68\nBank of India 0092\n4,935.00\nBank of India 0093\n4,935.00\nBank of India 0052\n4,935.00\nBank of India 0053\n4,935.00\nOther Bank Accounts\n581,690,080.00 682,996,171.53\nCash

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. SHRI VIJAY PRASAD, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue as well as cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2012-13 Acit, Central Circle-1, Ranchi Shri Vijay Prasad Flat No. 202, Madhusudan Sir Vs Krishanapuri, Dimna Road Mango, Jamshedpur-831012. Pan: Ailpp 0228 L (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No.19/Ran/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 35/Ran/2021) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Vijay Prasad Acit, Central Circle-1, Ranchi Flat No. 202, Madhusudan Sir Vs Krishanapuri, Dimna Road Mango, Jamshedpur-831012. Pan: Ailpp 0228 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 29.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 11.12.2023 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma: Jm This Appeal Is Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-3, Patna Dated 09.03.2021 Against Same Impugned Order A Cross-Objection Also Filed By The Assessee Being C.O. No. 19/Ran/2021. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income For The A.Y. 2012-13 On 11.09.2012 Showing Total Income Of Rs. 14,32,834/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass & The Assessment In The Case Of Assessee Was Completed U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 28.03.2014 Determining Total Income Of Rs.

10,34,644/- to the different transporters and the amount paid to transporter was more than Rs. 75,000/-and the assessee has not furnished the PAN of the transporters and it was in violation of section 40(a)(ia) u/s 194C r.w.s. 206AA of the income-tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the ld. AO disallowed such amount in the hands

CCL,RANCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1, RANCHI

34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2011-12\nAY 2012-13\nAY 2013-14\nAY 2014-15\nAY 2015-16\n169/RAN/2017\n170/RAN/2017\n266/RAN/2017\n32/RAN/2018\n190/RAN/2019\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land

DCIT CIR-1,, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2011-12\nBy Assessee\nAY 2012-13\nBy Assessee\nAY 2013-14\nBy Assessee\nAY 2014-15\nBy Assessee\nAY 2015-16\nBy Assessee\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land

DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α.\nNo.\nAY 2011-12\nAY 2012-13\nAY 2013-14\nAY 2014-15\nAY 2015-16\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land

CCL,RNCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α.\nNo.\nAY 2011-12\nAY 2012-13\nAY 2013-14\nAY 2014-15\nAY 2015-16\n169/RAN/2017\n170/RAN/2017\n266/RAN/2017\n32/RAN/2018\n190/RAN/2019\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nBy Assessee\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2011-12\nBy Assessee\nAY 2012-13\nBy Assessee\nAY 2013-14\nBy Assessee\nAY 2014-15\nBy Assessee\nAY 2015-16\nBy Assessee\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), DHANBAD vs. M/S HIMANGSU MAHTO, DHANBAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Sonjoy Sarma

TDS on interest has been made Rs.4123/- there by the ^closing balance of loan of M/S Royal Securities Ltd is Rs.2707784/-. The Learned Assessing Officer nowhere mentioned the details of transactions between the appellant and M/S Royal Securities Ltd. The dealing of landing and borrowing between the assessee and M/S Royal Securities Ltd is not the first time

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2011-12\nBy Assessee\nAY 2012-13\nBy Assessee\nAY 2013-14\nBy Assessee\nAY 2014-15\nBy Assessee\nAY 2015-16\nBy Assessee\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land\nLand & Crop Compensation\nCredit

M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, RANCHI

34,000\nDisputed\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land\nLand & Crop Compensation\nCredit of Dividend Distribution Tax\nRehabilitation fund Contribution Expenses\nIICM Charges\nProvisions Toward NCWA VIII\nMine Closure Expenses\nCSR Expenses - Welfare\nu/s 14A\nDisallowance of Prior

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI

34,000\nDisputed\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land\n1\n2\nLand & Crop Compensation\nCredit of Dividend Distribution Tax\n3\nRehabilitation fund Contribution Expenses\n4\nIICM Charges\n5\n6\nProvisions Toward NCWA VIII\nMine Closure Expenses

CCL LTD ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

34,000\nDisputed\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land\n1\n2\nLand & Crop Compensation\n3\nCredit of Dividend Distribution Tax\n4\nRehabilitation fund Contribution Expenses\nAY 2011-12\n169/RAN/2017\nBy Assessee

DCIT CIRCLE-1 , RANCHI vs. CCL LTD , RANCHI

34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2011-12\n169/RAN/2017\nBy Assessee\nAY 2012-13\n170/RAN/2017\nBy Assessee\nAY 2013-14\n266/RAN/2017\nBy Assessee\nAY 2014-15\n32/RAN/2018\nBy Assessee\nAY 2015-16\n190/RAN/2019\nBy Assessee\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land

CCL ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

34,000\n5,95,76,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α.\nNo.\nAY 2011-12\nAY 2012-13\nAY 2013-14\nAY 2014-15\nAY 2015-16\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land\nLand & Crop Compensation\nCredit of Dividend Distribution Tax\nRehabilitation fund Contribution Expenses\nIICM Charges\nProvisions

SHAH BROTHERS,CHAIBASA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshah Brothers, A.C.I.T., Thana Lane, Chaibasa-833201 Central Circle-1, Vs. (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aazfs 7498 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

10 /06/2025 O R D E R PER: BENCH 1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the learned CIT(A),Patna-3, Patna in appeal No. CIT(A), Patna-3/10246/2017-18 dated 30/05/2023 for the A.Y. 2013-14. 2. Shri R.R. Mittal, ld. A.R. is represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Khub

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR01 , RANCHI

34,000\nDisputed\n5,95,76,000\nM/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2011-12\n169/RAN/2017\nBy Assessee\n39,98,32,440\n24,09,000\nAY 2012-13\n170/RAN/2017\nBy Assessee\n30,88,83,502\n12,00,000\nAY 2013-14\n266/RAN/2017\nBy Assessee

CCL,RANCHI vs. ADDITIONAL CIT RG-1 , RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.164,165,166,167,168,169,170&266/Ran/2017 (A.Y :2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.32/Ran/2018 (Ay : 2014-2015) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.190 & 191/Ran/2019 (Ay:2015-16 & 2016-17) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.119, 120, 74/Ran/2024 (Ay: 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) M/S Central Coalfields Limited, Vs. Addl.Cit, Range-1, Ranchi Darbhanga House, Office Of Gm Finance-A, Opp. Governor House Ranchi-834001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaacc 7476 R & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.172,173,174,175,176,177,178 & 235/Ran/2017 (A.Y :2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.37/Ran/2018 (Ay : 2014-2015) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.174 & 175/Ran/2019 (Ay:2015-16 & 2016-17) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.47, 203, 204, 128/Ran/2024 (Ay: 2017-2018, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Addl.Cit, Range-1, Ranchi Vs. M/S Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Office Of Gm Finance-A, Opp. Governor House Ranchi-834001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaacc 7476 R (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri M.K.Chowdhary & Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocates राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 05/01/2026 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Ranchi/Nfac, Delhi, Dated 12.04.2017, 26.04.2017, 25.04.2027, 28.04.2017, 08.11.2017

TDS is liable to be deducted on the said payment. Thus, this issue is in held in favour of the assessee. 20. Next issue is in regard to provisions towards NCWA VIII. It was the submission that this is an interim relief on account of the pay revision. It was the submission that in April 2008 the holding company being